Main Article Content

  • Deddy A Suhardi
    Universitas Terbuka
  • Isfarudi Isfarudi
    Universitas Terbuka

Abstract


A very popular article by Baron and Kenny (1986), later extended by Kenny, Kashy, and


Bolger (1998), recommended to social psychologists a test of mediation based on a set of steps involving correlations and regression weights. The serial published tests of mediation has come to be known as the Baron-Kenny approach. By the Baron-Kenny approach, a simple complete mediation is to be indicated which is a test of the direct path between an independent variable (X) and a dependent variable (Y) with a mediator variable (M) controlled is not significant. A simple mediation model has three correlations of their variables each. According to sequential regression analysis on a simple mediation model, a mediator M come after an independent variable X exist in the model, has a contribution of the mediator. Otherwise, sample size is a critical component to test as well as statistically significances. We argue the importance of investigating condition and interrelation of the three correlations, sequential contribution of the mediator, and sample size in the simple complete mediation cases by using hypotetical data generated by Microsoft Excel. We indicate some general consequences of simple complete mediation cases that are: (i) average of correlation XY is lower than average of correlation XM that lower than average of correlation MY; (ii) average contribution of mediator, indicated by Rchange, at interval of 23% up to 27%; (iii) distribution of effects X on Y when M controlled is influenced by sample size, the higher sample size, the lower distribution is; and (iv) average of mediation effects is at interval: 0.4 and above for levels of small sampel size (10 up to 40), between 0.2 and 0.4 for levels of medium sample size (50 up to 300), and under 0.2 for levels of large sample size (500 or above).

 

Keywords

Baron-Kenny approach, complete mediation, contribution of mediator, mediation effect, simple mediation.

References

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

James, L. R. (2008). On the path to mediation. Organizational Research Methods, 11 (2), 359-363.

Kenny, D. (2008). Reflections on mediation. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 353-358.

Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A.,& Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 233-265). New York: McGraw-Hill.

MacKinnon, D. P., & Dwyer, J. H. (1993). Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies. Evaluation Review, 17, 144-158.

MacKinnon, D. P., Warsi, G., & Dwyer, J. H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30(1), 41-62.

MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M.,West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83-104.

Morrison, D. F. (1990). Multivariate statistical methods (3rd ed.). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.

Myers, R. H., and Milton, J.S. (1991). A first course in the theory of linear statistical models. Boston: PWS-Kent.

Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (2nd ed). New York: CBS College Publishing. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Preacher, K. J., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2006). Calculation for the sobel test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests. Diambil 22 Januari 2008, dari http://people.ku.edu/~preacher/sobel/sobel.htm.

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers, 36(4), 717-731.

Shrout, P. E.,& Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.

Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. Dalam S. Leinhart (Editor), Sociological Methodology 1982, pp.290-312. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Suhardi, D. A., & Isfarudi. (2009). Efektivitas variabel mediator berdasarkan kontribusinya dalam model mediasi sederhana. Jurnal Matematika, Sains, & Teknologi, 10 (1), 6-17.

Tukey, J.W., Hoaglin, D. C., & Mosteller, F. (1983). Understanding robust and exploratory data Analysis. New York: John Wiley.

Article Sidebar

Published Aug 15, 2010
How to Cite
SUHARDI, Deddy A; ISFARUDI, Isfarudi. BEBERAPA KONSEKUENSI SITUASI MEDIASI SEMPURNA PADA STRUKTUR KORELASI, KONTRIBUSI MEDIATOR, DAN UKURAN SAMPEL. Jurnal Matematika, Sains, Dan Teknologi, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 1, p. 10-29, aug. 2010. ISSN 2442-9147. Available at: <http://jurnal.ut.ac.id/index.php/JMST/article/view/479>. Date accessed: 23 nov. 2017.
Section
Articles