EFFECT OF DIFFERENT pH ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE Gracilaria changii

  • Nur Indah Sari Arrbit

Keywords:

Gracilaria changii, Ocean acidification, Growth, pH, Pigment

Abstract

The phenomenon of ocean acidification is a condition of decreasing ocean pH due to carbon dioxide absorption. Ocean acidification has a negative impact on marine organisms, one of which is seaweed. This study aims to determine the growth performance of Gracilaria  changii seaweed against different pH. This research was conducted for 30 days at the Multitrophic Laboratory and water quality Research Activity Center, Hasanuddin University Makassar. The experimental design carried out in this study was a completely randomized design (CRD) in which there were four treatments. The first treatment (P1) with a pH of 3.5, the second treatment (P2) with a pH of 5.5, the third treatment (P3) used a pH of 9.5 and the control treatment was pH 8 (P0). The test parameters in this research are daily weight growth, pigment content and water quality. Data analysis used ANOVA analysis of variance with further W-Tukey test. The results of this study were the growth performance of Gracilaria  sp. the best among all treatments is the pH 5.50 treatment where the growth rate is 11.49%. The optimum pH range for seaweed, especially Gracilaria  sp. ie 6-8. But at pH 5.5 it can still be tolerated and in this study.

References

Adini, S., Kusdiyantini, E.,& Budiharjo, A. 2015. Produksi Bioetanol dari Rumput Laut dan Limbah Agar Gracilaria sp. dengan Metode Sakarifikasi yang Berbeda. BIOMA. 16 (2): 65-75

Anggadireja JT, Zatnika A, Purwoto H dan Istini S. 2006. Rumput Laut. Jakarta.

Armita, D. 2011. Analisis Perbandingan Kualitas Air Di Daerah Budidaya Rumput Laut Di Dusun Malelaya, Desa Punaga, Kecamatan Mangarabombang, Kabupaten Takalar. Skripsi. Program Studi Manajemen Sumberdaya Perairan. Jurusan Perikanan. Fakultas Ilmu Kelautan Dan Perikanan. Universitas Hasanudin. Makassar

Caldeira, K., Herzog, H. J., & Wickett, M. E. (2001). Predicting and evaluating the effectiveness of ocean carbon sequestration by direct injection. First National Conference on Carbon Sequestration.

Cholik, F. etal.2005. Akuakultur. Masyarakat Perikanan Nusantara. Taman Akuarium Air Tawar. Jakarta.

Gultom, R. C., Dirgayusaa, I. G. N. P., & Puspitha, N. L. P. R. (2016). Perbandingan Laju Pertumbuhan Rumput Laut ( Eucheuma cottonii ) Dengan Menggunakan Sistem Budidaya Ko-kultur dan Monokultur di Perairan Pantai Geger , Nusa Dua , Bali. Journal of Marine Research and Technology, 5(1), 146–154.

Gutow, L., Rahman, M. M., Bartl, K., Saborowski, R., Bartsch, I., & Wiencke, C. (2014). Ocean acidification affects growth but not nutritional quality of the seaweed Fucus vesiculosus (Phaeophyceae, Fucales). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 453, 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2014.01.005

Hendriyani, I. S., & Setiari, N., 2009. Kandungan klorofil dan pertumbuhan kacang panjang (Vigna sinensis) pada tingkat penyediaan air yang berbeda. Jurnal Sains dan Matematika, Vol. 17(3), Vol. 145–150.

Kumar, A., Buia, M. C., Palumbo, A., Mohany, M., Wadaan, M. A. M., Hozzein, W. N., Beemster, G. T. S., & AbdElgawad, H. (2020). Ocean acidification affects biological activities of seaweeds: A case study of Sargassum vulgare from Ischia volcanic CO2 vents. Environmental Pollution, 259, 113765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113765

Kurniawan, M. C., Aryawati, R., & Putri, W. A. E., 2018. Pertumbuhan rumput laut Euchema spinosum dengan perlakuan asal thallus dan bobot berbeda di teluk lampung propinsi lampung. Maspari Journal, Vol. 10(2), Hal. 161-168.

Maryunus, R. P., 2018. Pengendalian penyakit ice-ice korelasi musim danmanipulasi terbatas lingkungan. Jurnal Kebijakan Perikanan Indonesia, Vol. 10(1), Hal. 1-10.

Priono, B. (2016). Budidaya Rumput Laut Dalam Upaya Peningkatan Industrialisasi Perikanan. Media Akuakultur, 8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.15578/ma.8.1.2013.1-8

Rukminasari, N., Nadiarti, & Awaluddin, K. (2014). Pengaruh derajat keasaman (pH) air laut terhadap konsentrasi kalsium dan laju pertumbuhan Halimeda sp. Jurnal Ilmu Kelautan Dan Perikanan, 24(1), 28–34. https://www.scribd.com/document/363166182/ph-derajat-air-laut-pdf

Suparmi, & Sahri, A. (2009). Mengenal Potensi Rumput laut: Kajian Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Rumput Laut dari Aspek Industri dan Kesehatan. Sultan Agung, XLIV(118), 95–116.

Suyitno, AL., 2008. Projek Pendampingan Sma Materi Praktikum : Klorofil/Pigmen Fotosintesis. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Tito, C. K., & Susilo, E. (2021). Pengasaman Laut Di Perairan Indonesia. JFMR-Journal of Fisheries and Marine Research, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jfmr.2021.005.02.29

Trono, G. C., dan Ganzon-fortes, E.T. (1988). Philippine Seaaweeds. National Book Store, Inc. Manila Pages 174-175.

Yarish, C., Redmond, S., & Kim, J. K.,2012. Gracilaria culture handbook for new england(pp. 1–49). pp. 1–49. england: Wrack Lines.

Zainuddin, F., & Rusdani, M. M. (2018). Performa Rumput Laut Kappaphycus Alvarezii dari Maumere dan Tembalang Pada Budidaya Sistem Longline. Journal of Aquaculture Science, 3(1), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.31093/joas.v3i1.37

Zatnika, A., 2009. Pedoman teknis budidaya rumput laut. Jakarta : Badan Pengkajian Dan Penerapan Teknologi.

Published
2022-08-11
How to Cite
Sari Arrbit, N. I. . (2022). EFFECT OF DIFFERENT pH ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE Gracilaria changii. AgriDev, 1(1), 41–50. Retrieved from http://jurnal.ut.ac.id/index.php/agribisnis/article/view/2891
Section
Articles