The Value Relevance of Intellectual Capital and Ownership Structure on the SMEs Performance

Written by Noorina Hartati, Rini Dwiyani Hadiwidjaja



Intellectual Capital (IC) consists of VACA (CE), VAHU (HC), STVA (SC), Ownership Managerial (OM), and Institutional Ownership (OI). This study aims to examine whether Intellectual Capital (IC) has a positive effect on company performance, which is proxied by ROA and ROE, with the Leverage and Total Assets as control variables. Specifically, the researcher tested eight (8) hypotheses using multiple linear regression (p-values). The results of multiple linear regression tests (p-value) show that the variables VACA (CE), VAHU (HC), STVA (SC), and Intellectual Capital (VAICtm) have a positive effect on SMEs financial performance, both with ROA and ROE proxies. However, Ownership Managerial (OM) and Ownership Institutional (OI) variables do not affect both ROA and ROE. Then for the control variable, leverage affects ROA, while Total Assets affect ROE. Therefore, the research further strengthens previous studies that Intellectual Capital and its components, which include Employed Capital, Human Capital, and Structural Capital, affect SME's financial performance, both through ROA and ROE. VAICTM is the best indicator to measure IC (Intellectual Capital). The improvement of the financial performance of Small and Medium Enterprise (SMEs), it is necessary to pay attention to their employees (HC), capital structure (CE), and organizational structure in the company (SC).


Intellectual Capital, Ownership Structure, Financial Performance, SMEs


Agus Harjito & Martono. (2011). Manajemen Keuangan, Edisi Kedua, Cetakan. Pertama,. In Penerbit EKONISIA, Yogyakarta.
Barney, J.B. & Clark, D. N. (2007). Resource-Based Theory Creating and Sustaining Competitive Advantages. In Oxford University Press (p. 327).
Darwis, H. (2009). Corporate Governance Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 13(3), 418–430.
Drucker, P. F. (1993). The Practice of Management (Introduction, Parts 1,2, 5, Conclusion).
Exchange, I. S. (n.d.). List of companies included in the IDX Small-Mid Cap Index. Retrieved from Indonesia Stock Exchange website:
Hanafi, M. M. & A. H. (2009). Analisis laporan Keuangan Edisi keempat. In Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.
Johanson, U., M. M. & M. S. (1999). Measuring and Managing Intangibles, Eleven Swedish Qualitative Exploratory Case Studies. Accounting for Intangibles and the Virtual Organisation.
Nugrahanti, Y. & Shella, N. (2012). Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan Sebagai Mekanisme Corporate Governance Terhadap Kinerja Perbankan. Jurnal Manajemen Universitas Maranatha., 11(2), 151–170.
Powell, Walter. Snellman, K. (2004). The Knowledge Economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 199–220.
Ray, G., Barney, J. B., & Muhana, W. A. (2004). Capabilities, Business Process, and Competi-tive Advantage: Choosing the Dependent Variable in Empirical Test of The Resource-based View. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 23-37.
Riahi-Belkaoui A. (2003). Intellectual capital and firm performance of US multinational firms, A study of the resource-based and stakeholder views. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(2), 215-226.
Salim, S. M. & G. karyawati. (2013). Pengaruh Modal Intelektual terhadap Kinerja Keuangan. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 1–13.
Sawarjuwono, Tjiptohadi & Agustine Prihatin Kadir. (2003). Intellectual capital: Perlakuan, Pengukuran dan Pelaporan (Sebuah Library Research). Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 5(1), 31-51.
Soetedjo, Soegeng & Safrina Mursida. (2014). Pengaruh Intellectual capital Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan pada Perusahaan Perbankan. Accounting National Symposium XVII.
Solikhah, B. dkk. (2010). Implikasi Intellectual Capital terhadap Financial Performance, Growth dan Market; Studi Empiris dengan Pendekatan Simplistic Specification. Accounting National Symposium XIII.
Spanos, Y. E. & Lioukas, S. (2001). An Examination into the Causal Logic of Rent Generation: Contrasting Porter's Competitive Strategy Framework and the Resource-based View Perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 907-934.
Sutrisno. (2000). Manajemen Keuangan: Teori, Konsep, dan Aplikasi. Edisi 1. In Yogyakarta: EKONISIA.
Ulum I., Ghozali I. & Chariri A. (2008). Intellectual Capital dan Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan: Suatu Analisis Dengan Pendekatan Partial Least Squares. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XI Pontianak, 2008.
Wahyudi, U. & H. P. P. (2006). Implikasi Struktur Kepemilikan Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan: Dengan Keputusan Keuangan Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Accounting National Symposium IX Padang.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resourced-Based View of The Firm. StrategicManagement Journal, 5, 171–180.
Widarjo, Wahyu. (2011). Pengaruh modal intelektual dan pengungkapan modal intelektual pada nilai perusahaan. article, Simposiom Nasional Akuntansi XIV.
Widyaningdyah, A. U. & Y. A. A. (n.d.). Intellectual Capital dan Keunggulan Kompetitif (Studi Empiris Perusahaan Manufaktur versi Jakarta Stock Industrial Classification-JASICA). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 15 (1), 1–14.
Yadnyana, M.. and. (2014). Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan, Kebijakan Pendanaan, dan Ukuran Perusahaan pada Kinerja Perusahaan. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 9(1), 58–68.
Yi‐Chun Huang, Y. J. W. (2010). The effects of organizational factors on green new product success: Evidence from high‐tech industries in Taiwan. Management Decision, 48(10), 1539–1567.
Yuniasih N. W., Wirama D. G. & Badera, I D. N. (2010). Eksplorasi Kinerja Pasar Perusahaan: Kajian Berdasarkan Modal Intelektual (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Keuangan Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIII Purwokerto, 2010.
Yusuf, Akbar, Darwis Said, & M. (2013). Hubungan antara Modal Intelektual dengan Nilai Pasar dan Kinerja Keuangan di Perusahaan Publik Indonesia. Universitas Hasanudin. Retrieved from
Zéghal D & Maaloul, A. (2010). Analysing value added as an indicator of intellectual capital and its consequences on company performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(1), 39-60.


DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'where clause'