EFEK PENGUKURAN KEUANGAN DAN NON KEUANGAN TERHADAP KINERJA: PANDANGAN TEORI PENETAPAN TUJUAN
Keywords: competence, fairness, keadilan, kompetensi, pengukuran kinerja, self determination, performance measurement
Abstract
The aim of this study tested the effects of the perception of fairness measure for assessing performance against the performance of the mediation of impact, competence and self-determination as an aspect of empowerment. This research uses experimental studies as a method of data collection by providing a variable size treatmen on performance measurement with the difficulty level objectives and the level of difficulty of the task. Experimental design used 2 x 2 x 2 between subjects.
Results from this study showed differences in the perception of fairness subordinate to measures of performance. But the interaction between the size of the performance measurement with goal difficulty and task difficulty did not provide evidence of a significant difference in perceptions of fairness of the performance measure. The mediating effect of impact, competence and self-determination with the perception fairness subordinate to the performance provides empirical evidence that perceptions of fairness subordinate to measure performance assessment can form subordinate beliefs are described by impact, competence and self-determination and enhance the performance of subordinate.
Tujuan riset ini adalah untuk menguji efek persepsi fairness ukuran penilain kinerja terhadap kinerja dengan mediasi impact, competence dan self determination sebagai aspek empowerment. Riset ini menggunakan studi eksperimen sebagai metoda pengumpulan data dengan memberikan treatment pada variabel ukuran penilaian kinerja dengan tingkat kesulitan tujuan dan tingkat kesulitan tugas. Desain eksperimen yang digunakan adalah 2 x 2 x 2 antar subjek. Hasil dari riset ini menunjukkan adanya perbedaan persepsi fairness subordinat terhadap ukuran kinerja. Tetapi interaksi antara ukuran penilaian kinerja dengan kesulitan tujuan dan kesulitan tugas tidak memberikan bukti adanya perbedaan signifikan persepsi fairness terhadap ukuran penilaian kinerja. Efek mediasi impact, competence dan self determination dengan persepsi fairnessi subordinat terhadap kinerja memberikan bukti empiris bahwa persepsi fairness subordinat terhadap ukuran penilaian kinerja dapat membentuk keyakinan subordinat yang dijelaskan oleh impact, competence dan self determination dan meningkatkan kinerja subordinat.
Downloads
References
Brewer, M.B, & Kramer, R.M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dillemas: Effects of social identity, group size and decision faming. Journal of personality and social psychology, 50.
Coote. Leonard V, Evan Price & Anna Lena. (2004). An investigation into the antecedents of goal congruence in retail-service setting. Journal of service marketing, vol.18.
Drake, Andrea R, Jeffrey Wong & Stephen B. Salter. (2007). Empowerment, motivation and performance: Examining the impact of feedback and incentives on nonmanagement employees. Behavioral research in accounting, 19: 71-89.
Fisher, Joseph G, Sean A. Peffer & Geoffrey B. Sprinkle. (2003). Budget-based contracts , budgt levels and group performance. Journal of management accounting research, vol.15.
Hopwood, A.G. (1972). An empirical study of the role of accounting data in performance evaluation. Empirical research in accounting: Selected studies. Journal of accounting research 10, 156-182.
Hoque, Z.,Mia, L., & Alam, M. (2001). Market competition, computer-aided manufacturing and use of multiple performance measures: An Empirical Study. The british accounting review, vol. 33
Kaplan, R.S. (1984). The evolution of management accounting. The accounting review, 390-418
Kaplan, R.S.,Atkinson,A.A.,(1998). Third ed. Advanced Management Accounting, 3. Prentice-Hall, USA.
Kelly, Khim; Vance, Thomas; Webb, Allan. (2010). The interactive effects of subyectivity and goal difficulty on performance: An experimental study. University of Waterloo.
Kruger, Dunning (1999). Unskilled and unware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self- assessment. Journal of personalitiy and social psychology, vol 77(6), 1121-1134.
Lau, C.M., Lim, E.W. (2002). The effects of procedural justice and evaluative styles on the relationship between budgetary participation and performance. Advances in accounting 19, 139-1.
Lau, Chong M., Sholihin, Mahfud. (2005). Financial and nonfinancial performance measures: How do they affect job satisfaction?. The bristish accounting review, 37, 389-413.
Lind, E. A. & Tyler, T.R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice, Plenum Press NY.
Locke, E.A., Latham, G.P. (1991). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Locke, E.A., Shaw, K.N., Saari, L.M., Latham, G.P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance: 1969-1980â€. Pschological bulletin, 90, p.125-152.
McFarlin, D.B., Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as perdictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of management journal 35, 626-637
Ning Ho, Hsin. (2010). The relationship between levels of expertis, task difficulty, perceived self-efficacy and mental effort investment in task performance. Disertasi.
Otley, D.T.,(1978). Budget use and managerial performance. Journal of accounting research, vol 16, 12-148.
Tan, Sharon L.C., Lau, Chong M. (2012). The impact of performance measures on employee fairness perceptions, job satisfaction and organizational commitment, vol. 10(2).
Thibaut, J., Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Lawrence erlbaum associates, Hillside N.J.
Thomas, K.W. & Velthouse’s, B.A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment. Academy of management review, 15: 666-681.
Wood, R. E. & Bandura, A. (1989a). Social cognitive theory of organizational. Academy of Management Review. vol 14(3), 361-384.