Peer Review Process

JIAPI: JURNAL ILMU ADMINISTRASI DAN PEMERINTAHAN INDONESIA maintains the standards of peer review while increasing the efficiency of the process.

All research articles published in JIAPI: JURNAL ILMU ADMINISTRASI DAN PEMERINTAHAN INDONESIA undergo full peer review, key characteristics of which are listed below:

• All research articles are reviewed by at least two suitably qualified experts.
• All publication decisions are made by the journals’ Editors-in-Chief on the basis of the reviews provided
• Managing Editors and Editorial Assistants provide the administrative support that allows JIAPI: JURNAL ILMU ADMINISTRASI DAN PEMERINTAHAN INDONESIA to maintain the integrity of double-blind peer review while delivering rapid turnaround and maximum efficiency to authors, reviewers, and editors alike.
• JIAPI: JURNAL ILMU ADMINISTRASI DAN PEMERINTAHAN INDONESIA additionally benefits through the manuscript referral process from the high-quality peer review conducted by established journals.
• The period of peer review, editing, copyediting, and proofreading process usually takes 3-4 months.

Peer review of referred papers:

Editors of JIAPI: JURNAL ILMU ADMINISTRASI DAN PEMERINTAHAN INDONESIA will decide promptly whether to accept, reject, or request revisions of referred papers based on the reviews and editorial insight of the supporting journals. In addition, Editors will have the option of seeking additional reviews when needed. The authors will be advised when Editors decide further review is needed.

Peer review of novel submissions:

Articles submitted directly to JIAPI: JURNAL ILMU ADMINISTRASI DAN PEMERINTAHAN INDONESIA will be fully peer-reviewed by at least two appropriately qualified experts in the field selected by the Editor-in-Chief. The Editor-in-Chief or a designated member of the Editorial Board will then decide whether to accept, reject or request revisions based on the reviews and comments received.

Editors will decide whether each submission reports well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper. Assessments of priority will not be a factor in decision-making, but all papers must make an incremental or novel addition to the literature.