Gender Inequality in the Family Planning Program: A Case Study of Couples of Reproductive Age in Fataatu Village, Ende Regency

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the causes of gender inequality in contraceptive use among couples of reproductive age in Fataatu Village, Wewaria Subdistrict, Ende Regency. The research employs a qualitative descriptive approach. Data were collected through observation, documentation, and interviews with 13 informants. The findings reveal several key points. First, stereotypes in contraceptive use are influenced by stigma and cultural norms that often frame family planning programs (KB) as primarily a woman's responsibility. Second, no evidence of subordination in decision-making was found, as decisions were reached through mutual discussions between husband and wife. Third, women bear a double burden in contraceptive use, willingly accepting the consequences and side effects without objection. From an external perspective (etic), women are perceived to experience inequality in contraceptive use. However, from an internal perspective (emic), as expressed by husbands and wives, the use of contraceptives by women is considered fair. Several factors drive this perception. First, local culture normalizes contraceptive use by women more than by men. Second, women tend to possess better knowledge of contraceptives, while men lack awareness of male contraceptive options. Third, women are more accepting of the side effects associated with contraceptive use compared to men.