Involving students and prospective mathematics teachers through the use of the Think Pair Share design: The impact on increasing students' activeness and learning outcomes in plane geometry
Keywords:
Think Pair Share design, active learning, geometry learning outcomesAbstract
This research aims to determine the increase in student activity and learning outcomes in flat building materials through the use of the think pair share (TPS) design. The research design used to achieve the objectives of this research was classroom action research conducted at SMP Negeri 1 Indramayu. Apart from that, the subjects in this research were 32 students in class VII B, while the instruments used in this research were student observation sheets which aimed to measure activity and formative tests given each cycle. Next, deep data analysis study uses pattern study quantitative descriptive for measure enhancement results Study mathematics students through test formative and measuring enhancement activities carried out every cycle. The results of data processing on learning outcomes obtained an average of 65.09 for cycle I, cycle II of 74.07, and cycle III of 80.45. Likewise, the increase in the number of students reaching completeness Study that is from cycle I as much 5 students out of 32 students or 22%, cycle II as many as 15 students out of 31 students or 47% of the criteria high completeness, and in cycle III there were 26 students out of 31 students or 81% included in the category the criteria for completeness are very high. Next, based on the results of data processing of student activity during the learning process obtained that cycle I had not reached the active category (A) (24 students out of 32 were inactive or 25% from target 75% so cycle I Not yet reach category active). In Cycle II there was an increase from Cycle I to reach the active category (A), namely 20 students were active in the learning process and 11 students were still not actively involved in the learning process. Additionally, in Cycles III there was a significant increase in reaching the active category (A), namely, there were 25 students, or 81% of students involved in the learning process, while the rest were still not active. This matter shows that using the Think Pair Share (TPS) design through the involvement of students and mathematics teachers can increase student activity and learning outcomes in plain material.
References
Tanujaya, B, Prahmana, R.C.I & Mumu, J. (2017). Mathematics instruction, problems, challenges and opportunities: a case study in Manokwari Regency, Indonesia. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 15(3), 287–291.
Foley, A. E., Herts, J. B., Borgonovi, F., Guerriero, S., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2017). The Math Anxiety-Performance Link: A Global Phenomenon. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416672
Fritz, A., Haase, V. G., & Rasanen, P. (2019). International handbook of mathematical learning difficulties. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Hadi, A. M., & Saifullah, S. (2020). Peningkatan hasil belajar matematika melalui pendekatan think-pair-share pada matakuliah geometri analitik. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JP-IPA), 1(02), 54-58. https://doi.org/10.56842/jp-ipa.v1i02.17
Hutagalung, R. (2017). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran model guided discovery berbasis budaya batak toba untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis siswa SMP. Pythagoras, 6(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.33373/pythagoras.v6i1.622
Isnawan, M. G., & Sudirman, S. (2022). Principal competency model development: Phenomenological design with coaching techniques in Sekolah Penggerak. Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan, 8(01), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.32678/tarbawi.v8i01.5867
Latifah, S. S., & Luritawaty, I. P. (2020). Think Pair Share sebagai model pembelajaran kooperatif untuk peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 35–46.
Laurens, T., Batlolona, F. A., Batlolona, J. R., & Leasa, M. (2018). How does realistic mathematics education (RME) improve students’ mathematics cognitive achievement? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 569–578. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/76959
Nandang, N., Taufan, M., & Noviana, N. (2023). Student challenges completing the matrix material story question. Polyhedron International Journal in Mathematics Education, 1(1), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.59965/pijme.v1i1.4
Nindya, E & Purnami, A.S. (2018). Peningkatan keaktifan dan hasil belajar melalui model pembelajaran discovery. Jurnal Pendidikan Ke-SD-an 4(2), 369–374. https://doi.org/10.30738/trihayu.v4i2.2245
Ribut, O. (2021). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif think pair share pada prestasi matematika siswa sekolah menengah pertama. Jurnal Jendela Pendidikan, 1(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.57008/jjp.v1i1.1
Riva, P.J. (2014). Pengaruh implementasi model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe think pair share terhadap motivasi belajar dan prestasi belajar dalam pembelajaran IPS pada siswa kelas V sekolah dasar gugus VIII Kecamatan Buleleng. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 4, 4.
Rosita, I., & Leonard, L. (2015). Meningkatkan kerja sama siswa melalui pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Think Pair Share. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 3(1), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v3i1.108
Runisah, R. R., Ismunandar, D., Sudirman, S., & Vianto, Y. G. (2021). Auditory intellectually repetition: apakah berdampak pada kemampuan pemahaman geometri siswa berkemampuan rendah?. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 5(1), 125-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v5i1.4224
Sari, I. J., & Arnida. (2019). Pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran think pair share terhadap kemampuan representasi matematis ditinjau dari kemampuan awal matematika siswa. JURING (Journal for Research in Mathematics Learning), 2(3), 191. http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/juring.v2i3.7525
Safitri, Y., Zubainur, C. M., & Hidayat, M. (2019). Pembelajaran materi geometri transformasi dengan model think pair share berbantuan geogebra. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1).
Son, A. L., Sudirman, S., & Widodo, S. A. (2020). Asosiasi kemampuan koneksi dan pemecahan masalah matematika: cross-sectional di timor barat. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 326-337.
Sriyani, E.A., Nandang & Sudirman. (2019). Kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa antara yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe student teams’ achievement division dengan jigsaw berdasarkan tingkat kemampuan awal. Wacana Didaktika, 11(2), 27-33.
Sudirman, S., Senjaya, A. J., & SW, P. E. (2017). Analisis gaya belajar siswa tunagrahita ringan materi perkalian di Sekolah dan di Rumah. Journal of Medives: Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 1(1), 1-8.
Sudirman, S., Son, A. L., Rosyadi, R., & Fitriani, R. N. (2020). Uncovering the students’ mathematical concept understanding ability: a based study of both students’ cognitive styles dependent and independent field in overcoming the problem of 3D Geometry. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 10(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v10i1.3789
Supomo, W. E. (2018). Pengaruh model think-pair-share (TPS) untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar siswa dalam pembelajaran pendidikan kewarganegaraan di kelas VII SMP Kartika IV 8 Malang Tahun Pelajaran 2017/2018. Likhitaprajna, 19(1), 89–99.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mochammad Taufan, Adila Juliana Rosa, Rahmat Hidayat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
