Tri-System Aggregation Model Untuk Kurasi Arsip Riset Digital: Pengembangan Model Pada Badan Riset Dan Inovasi Nasional
Kata Kunci: agregasi arsip digital, AWANBRIN, kurasi data, SINAR, SRIKANDI, TSAM
Abstrak
Fragmentasi arsip riset digital menjadi tantangan utama dalam pengelolaan aset intelektual di Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional (BRIN). Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan model agregasi arsip riset digital yang efisien, terstandar, dan dapat ditelusuri sebagai respons terhadap belum optimalnya mekanisme terpadu untuk mengonsolidasikan arsip substantif riset dari berbagai unit Eselon I. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan Design Science Research dengan mengacu pada tahapan identifikasi masalah, perancangan dan pengembangan artefak, demonstrasi, evaluasi, serta komunikasi hasil. Artefak yang dikembangkan adalah Tri-System Aggregation Model (TSAM), yaitu model kurasi arsip riset digital yang mengintegrasikan tiga infrastruktur utama BRIN: AWANBRIN sebagai lapisan agregasi data mentah, SINAR sebagai lapisan pembentukan dan validasi berkas digital, serta SRIKANDI sebagai lapisan registrasi, pengesahan administratif, dan diseminasi metadata arsip final. Kontribusi inti penelitian adalah pengembangan standar Densier Digital, yaitu paket arsip terstruktur yang menyatukan data mentah riset, laporan teknis, metadata, dan naskah dinas dalam satu entitas arsip digital yang utuh, evidensial, dan terjaga provenansinya. Validasi melalui pilot project di Pusat Riset Sains Data dan Informasi BRIN menunjukkan bahwa model tiga lapis ini mampu mempercepat proses kurasi arsip riset, mengurangi fragmentasi data, serta meningkatkan akuntabilitas pengelolaan aset intelektual. Temuan ini juga menegaskan pergeseran peran arsiparis dari pelaksana administratif menuju kurator data strategis yang berkontribusi pada penguatan tata kelola riset nasional.
Referensi
Ågerfalk, P. J. (2018). Whither design science research? European Journal of Information Systems, 27(2), 127–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2018.1458065
Azmir, A. F., & Salim, T. A. (2022). Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of archivist competencies in digital curation. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 18(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.v18i2.5415
Baskerville, R., Baiyere, A., Gregor, S., Hevner, A., & Rossi, M. (2018). Design science research contributions: Finding a balance between artifact and theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(5), 358–376. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00495
Bawono, H. (2022). Digital preservation and digital records and archives management in Indonesia: Contextualization-synthesis of two models digital preservation. Jurnal Kearsipan, 17(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.46836/jk.v17i2.257
Borgman, C. L., Scharnhorst, A., & Golshan, M. S. (2019). Digital data archives as knowledge infrastructures: Mediating data sharing and reuse. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(9), 1008–1019. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24172
Choudhury, S., Huang, C., & Palmer, C. L. (2020). Updating the DCC curation lifecycle model. International Journal of Digital Curation, 15(1), 721. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v15i1.721
Colavizza, G., Blanke, T., Jeurgens, C., & Noordegraaf, J. (2021). Archives and AI: An overview of current debates and future perspectives. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 14(4), 19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479010
Cosmo, R. D., Gruenpeter, M., Marmol, B., Monteil, A., Romary, L., & Sadowska, J. (2020). Curated archiving of research software artifacts: Lessons learned from the French Open Archive (HAL). International Journal of Digital Curation, 15(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v15i1.698
Donkoh, S. (2023). Application of triangulation in qualitative research. Journal of Applied Biotechnology & Bioengineering, 10(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.15406/jabb.2023.10.00319
Frings-Hessami, V. (2023). Accessing and preserving information: Combining ICT4D and archival practices. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(3), 839–852. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24702
Gooch, M. (2025). Human perspectives and social infrastructures: Prioritising the human in digital infrastructure. Journal of Open Humanities Data, 11(2), 274. https://doi.org/10.5334/johd.274
Hevner, A., vom Brocke, J., & Maedche, A. (2018). Roles of digital innovation in design science research. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0571-z
Hurley, C., McKemmish, S., & Reed, B. (2024). The power of provenance in the records continuum. Archival Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-024-09463-9
Huseynli, M., Bub, U., & Ogbuachi, M. C. (2022). Development of a method for the engineering of digital innovation using design science research. Information, 13(12), 573. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13120573
Laine, J., Zimmer, M., Minkkinen, M., Salmela, H., & Mäntymäki, M. (2022). Clustering design science research based on the nature of the designed artifact. In Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (pp. 254–266). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15342-6_20
Late, E., & Ochsner, M. (2024). Re-use of research data in the social sciences: Use and users of digital data archive. PLOS ONE, 19(5), e0303190. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303190
Lorenz, M., & Konečný, M. (2023). Digital archives as research infrastructure of the future. Acta Informatica Pragensia, 2023(2), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.aip.219
Odhiambo, B. O. (2018). Institutional readiness for digital archives management at universities: A records continuum perspective. Archives and Manuscripts, 46(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2018.1558407
Opgenhaffen, L. (2022). Archives in action: The impact of digital technology on research archives. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 55, 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2022.e00231
Pacheco, A., & Guardado da Silva, C. (2023). From the Archival Bond to the Informational Bond. Preservation, Digital Technology & Culture, 52(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1515/pdtc-2023-0004
Peer, L., & Dull, J. (2020). YARD: A tool for curating research outputs. Data Science Journal, 19, 28. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-028
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
Post, C., & Chassanoff, A. Beyond the workflow: archivists’ aspirations for digital curation practices. Arch Sci 21, 413–432 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-021-09365-0
PREMIS Editorial Committee. (2015). PREMIS data dictionary for preservation metadata, version 3.0. Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v3/
Punzalan, R. L. (2023). Archives and the digital world. Archival Science, 23(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-022-09400-8
Rhee, H. L. (2024). A new lifecycle model enabling optimal digital curation. Journal of Documentation, 80(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006221125956
Syafiya, L. K., Ansor, S., & Prasetyawan, A. (2024). Pola pengelolaan arsip digital dalam mendukung kemampuan organisasi di DPUPRPKP Kota Malang. Bibliotika: Jurnal Kajian Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 8(1), 238–258. https://doi.org/10.17977/um008v8i12024p238-258
Treloar, A., & Klump, J. (2019). Updating the Data Curation Continuum. International Journal of Digital Curation, 14(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v14i1.643
Tuunanen, T., Winter, R., & vom Brocke, J. (2024). Dealing with complexity in design science research: A methodology using design echelons. MIS Quarterly, 48(2), 427–458. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2023/16700
vom Brocke, J., Winter, R., Hevner, A., & Maedche, A. (2020). Special issue editorial: Accumulation and evolution of design knowledge in design science research—A journey through time and space. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(3), 520–544. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00611
Wang, H., & Yang, D. (2021). Research and development of blockchain recordkeeping at the National Archives of Korea. Computers, 10(8), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10080090
Weigand, H., Johannesson, P., & Andersson, B. (2021). An artifact ontology for design science research. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 133, 101878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2021.101878
Weigand, H., & Johannesson, P. (2023). How to identify your design science research artifact. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 25th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI) (pp. 1–10). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI58679.2023.10187511
