EVALUASI KESESUAIAN LAHAN UNTUK REHABILITASI HUTAN MANGROVE KOTA LANGSA ACEH
Keywords: ekosistem mangrove, kesesuaian lahan, land suitability, mangrove ecosystem, rehabilitasi, rehabilitation
Abstract
Mangrove ecosystem has the role of interface ecosystem between land and sea. It has social, economic and ecological functions. The decreasing quality and quantity of mangrove mangrove forrest has resulted in environmental damage. Langsa City has mangrove forest in damaged condition because of conversion into fish ponds, illegal logging, pollution and settlements. The purpose of this research was to determine the level of land suitability of rehabilitated mangrove areas. The research was conducted in Langsa City, Aceh. Location and method of this research determined by purposive and descriptive with survey techniques. The Analytical method used is a suitability analysis. According to land suitability matrix and spatial analysis, there were three types of mangroves that can be used for rehabilitation programs in the study area like Rhizophora spp., Avicennia spp., and Sonneratia spp. In land suitability level, Rhizophora spp. had the highest of land suitability around 1.263,92 ha (66,88%).
Ekosistem mangrove merupakan wilayah yang berperan sebagai peralihan antara daratan dan lautan yang mempunyai fungsi ekologi, sosial ekonomi, dan fisik. Menurunnya kualitas dan kuantitas hutan mangrove telah mengakibatkan kerusakan lingkungan. Kondisi hutan mangrove Kota Langsa pada saat ini mengalami kerusakan. Faktor utama penyebab kerusakan, antara lain konversi hutan mangrove menjadi tambak, pembalakan liar, pencemaran, dan permukiman baru. Tujuan penelitian untuk menentukan tingkat kesesuaian lahan pada areal rehabilitasi mangrove. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Kota Langsa, Aceh. Penentuan lokasi penelitian dilakukan secara purposive dan menggunakan metode deskriptif dengan teknik survei. Analisis kesesuaian lahan dan analisis spasial untuk mengetahui tingkat kesesuaian lahan mangrove digunakan dalam penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, ada tiga jenis mangrove yang dapat digunakan untuk program rehabilitasi, yaitu: Rhizophora spp., Avicennia spp., dan Sonneratia spp. Berdasarkan tingkat kesesuaian lahan, jenis Rhizophora spp. mempunyai tingkat kesesuaian lahan tertinggi. Luasan lahan yang dapat ditanami jenis Rhizophora spp. seluas 1.263,92 ha (66,88%).
Downloads
References
Aksornkoae, S & Kato, S. (2011). Mangroves for the people and environmental conservation in Asia. Bulletin of the Society of Sea Water Science, Japan. 65:3-9.
Alongi, D.M. (2008). Mangrove forests: resilience, protection from tsunamis, and responses to global climate change. Journal Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, (76): 1–13.
[Bapedda] Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kota Langsa. (2014). Peta sebaran kawasan hutan Kota Langsa. Langsa. Bapedda Kota Langsa.
Brown, B. & Lewis, R.R. (2006). Five steps to successful ecological restoration of mangroves. Lewis, R. et al. (Eds.) Yogyakarta: Yayasan Akar Rumput Laut (YARL) and the Mangrove Action Project.
Carter, H.N., Schmidt, S.W., & Hirons, A.C. (2015). An international assessment of mangrove management: incorporation in integrated coastal zone management. Journal Diversity, (7):74–104.
Daupan, S.M.M.V. (2016). Community Participation in Mangrove Forest Management in the Philippines: Management Strategies, Influences to Participation, and Socio-Economic and Environmental Impacts. (Thesis). Master of Science Natural Resources and Environment. University of Michigan. USA.
[DKPP Kota Langsa] Dinas Kelautan, Perikanan dan Pertanian Kota Langsa. (2014). Sebaran realisasi kegiatan bidang kehutanan. Langsa (ID): DKPP Kota Langsa.
Field, C. D. (1998). Rehabilitation of mangrove ecosystems: an overview. Marine Pollution Bulletin 37:383–392.
Giri, C., Long, J., Abbas, S., Murali, R.M., Qamer, F.M., Pengra, B., & Thau, D. (2015). Distribution and dynamics of mangrove forests of South Asia. Journal of Environmental Management, 148:101–111.
Jusoff, K. (2013). Review: Malaysian mangrove forests and their significance to the coastal marine environment. Polish Journal Environmental Studies, 22: 979–1005.
Kathiresan, K. (2003). How do mangrove forests induce sedimentation? Tamil Nadu (IN). Revista de biologia tropical, 51(2): 355–360.
Kathiresan, K. (2012). Importance of mangrove ecosystem. International Journal of Marine Science, 2(10):70–89.
Kodikara, K.A.S., Mukherjee, N., Jayatissa, LP., Dahdouh-Guebas, F., & Koedam, N. (2017). Have mangrove restoration projects worked? An in-depth study in Sri Lanka. Restoration Ecology, 25(5):705–716.
Kusmana, C. (2014). Distribution and current status of mangrove forests in Indonesia. In: Mangrove ecosystem of Asia: status, challenges and management strategies. Farida-Hanum I., Latiff A., Hakeem K. R., Ozturk M. (eds), Springer, pp. 37–60.
Kusmana, C., Wilarso, S., Iwan, H., Pamoengkas, P., Wibowo, C., Tiryana, T., Triswanto, A., & Hamzah, Y. (2005). Teknik rehabilitasi mangrove. Bogor: Fahutan IPB.
Lavieren, H.V, Spalding, M., Alongi, D.A., Kainuma, M., Godt, M.C., & Adeel, Z. (2015). Securing the future of mangroves. United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health. Hamilton, Canada.
Melana, D.M., Atchue, J., Yao, C.E., Edwards, R., Melana, E.E., & Gonzales, H.I. (2000). Mangrove management handbook. Coastal Resource Management Project of The Departement of Environment and Natural Resources. Manila, Philipinnes.
Mirrera, O.D., Ochiewo, J., Munyi, F., & Muriuki, T. (2013). Heredity or traditional knowledge: Fishing tactics and dynamics of artisanal mangrove crab (Scylla) fishery. Ocean and Coastal Management, 84:119–129.
Nguyen, T.P., Tong V.A., Quoi, L.P., & Parnell, K.E. (2016). Mangrove restoration: establishment of a mangrove nursery on acid sulphate soils. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 28: 275–84.
Noor, Y.R., Khazali, M., & Suryadiputra, I.N.N. (2006). Panduan pengenalan mangrove di Indonesia. Bogor (ID): Ditjen PHKA, Wetlands International-Indonesian Programme.
Odum, W. E., McIvor, C.C., & Smith, III. I.J. (1982). The ecology of the mangroves of South.
Florida: a community profile. FWS/OBS-81/24. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services, Washington, D.C., USA.
Primavera, J.H., & Esteban, J.M.A. (2008). A review of mangrove rehabilitation in the Philippines: successes, failures and future prospects. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 16:345–3 58.
Richards, D.R., & Friess, D.A. (2016). Rates and drivers of mangrove deforestation in Southeast Asia, 2000-2012. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12;113(2):344–349.
Rönnbäck, P., Crona, B., & Ingwall, L. (2007). The return of ecosystem goods and services in
replanted mangrove forests: perspectives from local communities in Kenya. Environmental Conservation, 34:313–324.
Saenger, P., Heger, E.J., & Davies, J.D.S. (1983). Global status of mangrove ecosytem. Bangkok (Thai): IUCN.
[Satker] Satuan Kerja Badan Rehabilitasi dan Rekonstruksi NAD-Nias. (2008). Rehabilitasi hutan mangrove dan hutan pantai di pesisir Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam. Banda Aceh (ID): Pusat Pengendalian Lingkungan dan Konservasi BRR NAD-Nias.
Schmitt, K., & Duke, N.C. (2016). Mangrove management, assessment, and monitoring. In: Pancel L., Köhl M. (eds) Tropical forestry handbook. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Spalding, M.D., Kainuma, M., & Collins, L. (2010). World atlas of mangroves; Earthscan Ltd.: Washington, DC, USA.
Stone, K., Bhat, M., Bhatta, R., & Mathews, A. (2008). Factors influencing community participation in mangroves restoration: a contingent valuation analysis. Ocean & Coastal Management, 51:476–484.
Thomas, N., Lucas, R., Bunting, P., Hardy, A., Rosenqvist, A., & Simard, M. (2017). Distribution and drivers of global mangrove forest change, 1996–2010. PLoS One. 12:e0179302.
Wenqing, W., Zhongzheng, Y., Siyang, Y., Yihui, Z., Luzhen, C., & Guanghui, L. (2011). Mangroves: obligate or facultative halophytes? A review. Research Gate. Trees 25:953–963.