PENGARUH PARTISIPASI PUBLIK, TRANSPARANSI ANGGARAN DAN KOMITMEN PERUMUS KEBIJAKAN TERHADAP RESPONSIVITAS ANGGARAN
Keywords: anggaran daerah, commitment of policy makers, komitmen pembuat kebijakan, local budgets, partisipasi masyarakat, public participation, transparansi, transparency
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the linkages the responsiveness of the budget with public participation, budget transparency and commitment of policy makers in term of local budgeting process. Based on the survey method, data for this study obtained through questionnaires submitted to the respondents include of local governments elements, legislators and public element (citizen, community leaders, NGOs, community organization and other relevant organizations) in Sleman Regency. The data were analyzed to test the hypothesis by using multiple regression analysis. The results of this research showed that public participation, budget transparency and commitment of policy makers, simultaneously and partially has a positive and significant impact on the responsiveness of the budget. The results also confirm the implications and limitations which discussed in the end of the study.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui keterkaitan respon dari anggaran dengan partisipasi masyarakat, transparansi anggaran dan komitmen dari pembuat kebijakan dalam hal proses penganggaran daerah. Berdasarkan metode survei, data untuk penelitian ini diperoleh melalui kuesioner yang diajukan kepada responden meliputi pemerintah daerah elemen, legislator dan elemen masyarakat (warga negara, tokoh masyarakat, LSM, organisasi masyarakat dan organisasi terkait lainnya) di Kabupaten Sleman. Data dianalisis untuk menguji hipotesis dengan menggunakan analisis regresi berganda. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa partisipasi publik, transparansi anggaran dan komitmen dari pembuat kebijakan, secara simultan dan parsial memiliki dampak positif dan signifikan terhadap respon dari anggaran. Hasil ini juga mengkonfirmasi implikasi dan keterbatasan yang dibahas dalam akhir penelitian.
Downloads
References
Bryer, T. A., & Cooper, T. L. (2007). Challenges in enhancing responsiveness in neighborhood governance. Public performance & management review, vol. 31(2), 191-214.
Caamaño-Alegre, J., Lago-Peñas, S., Reyes-Santias, F., & Santiago-Boubeta, A. (2011). Budget transparency in local governments: an empirical analysis. International studies program working paper 11-02. Andrew young school of policy studies, Georgia State University. Diakses 30 September 2013 dari http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1768091
Dwiyanto, A., dkk. (2003). Reformasi tata pemerintahan dan otonomi daerah. Yogyakarta: Pusat Studi Kependudukan dan Kebijakan Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Ebdon, C., & Franklin, A., L. (2006). Citizen participation in budgeting theory. Public administration review, vol. 66(3), 437-447.
Farhan, Y., & Bush, R. (2010). Kinerja pengelolaan anggaran daerah 2009: Study di 41 kabupaten/kota di Indonesia, Jakarta: Seknas FITRA bekerjasama dengan The Asia Foundation, dan Departement for International Development.
Ghozali, H. I. (2011). Aplikasi analisis multivariat dengan program IBM SPSS 19. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Hanida, R. P. (2010). Dinamika penyusunan anggaran daerah: Studi tentang proses penetapan program dan alokasi anggaran belanja daerah di kabupaten Sleman, Tesis yang tidak dipublikasikan, Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Administrasi Negara, UGM, Yogyakarta.
Hardojo, A. P., dkk. (2008). Mendahulukan miskin: Buku sumber bagi anggaran pro rakyat (Waidl, A., Sudjito, A., & Bahagijo, S. [Eds.]). Yogyakarta: LKS
Justice, J. B., & Dülger, C. (2009). Fiscal transparency and authentic citizen participation in public budgeting: The role of third-party intermediation. Journal od public budgeting, accounting & financial management, vol. 21(2), 254-288.
King, C. S., Feltey, K. M., & Susel, B. O’Neill (1998). The question of participation: Toward authentic public participation in public administration. Public administration review, vol. 58(4), 317-326. Diakses 22 Maret 2013 dari http://www.jstor.org/stable/977561 .
Korolev, A. (2012). Regime responsiveness to basic needs: A dimensional approach. Disertasi, School of government and public administration, The Chinese University of Hong Kong. Diakses 05 Agustus 2013, dari ProQuest ILC Database.
Kurniadi, B. D., dkk. (2009). Menuju bekerjanya tata pemerintahan lokal yang baik: Partisipasi, transparansi, dan akuntabilitas. Monograph on politics & government, vol. 3(I), pp. 1-86.
Liao, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2012). Citizen participation in local budgeting: Mechanisms, political support, and city manager’s moderating role. International review of public administration, vol. 17(2), 19-38.
Mardiasmo. (2004). Otonomi dan manajemen keuangan daerah. (2th ed.) Yogyakarta: Andi.
Marlowe, J., & Portillo, S. (2006). Citizen Engagement in Local Budgeting: Does Diversity Pay Dividends? Public Performance & Management Review, Vol. 30 (2), 179-202.
McGee, R., & Gaventa, J. (2010). Synthesis report: review of impact and effectiveness of transparency and accountability initiatives (Transparency and accountability initiatives). London: Open Society Foundation, Cambridge House.
PBB (United Nations). (2007). Towards participatory and transparent governance: Reinventing government (Publication based on 6th global forum on reinventing government: Towards participatory and transparent governance 26-27 May 2005, Seoul, Republic of Korea), Newyork: Department of economic and social affairs, division for public administration and development management.
Purwanto, E., A. (2008). Pelayanan publik partisipatif. Dalam Dwiyanto, A. (Ed), 2008, Mewujudkan good governance melalui pelayanan publik, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Robertson, P. J., & Tang, Shui-Yan. (1995). The role of commitment in collective action: Comparing the organizational behavior and rational choice perspectives. Public administration review, vol. 55(1), 67-80.
Stevens, C. E., & Cooper, J., T. (2009). A Behavioral Theory of Governments’ Ability to Make Credible Commitments to Firms: The case of the East Asian paradox. Asia Pac J Manag, Vol. 27, 587–610.
Wildavsky, A. (1961). Political implications of budgetary reform. Public administration review, vol. 21(4), 183-190.
Yang, K., & Pandey, S., K. (2007). Public responsiveness of government organizations: Testing a preliminary model. Public performance & management review, vol. 31(2), 215-240.
Yang, K. (2007). Responsiveness in network governance: Revisiting a fundamental concept: Symposium introduction. Public performance & management review, vol. 31(2), 131-143.
Yang, K., & Callahan, K. (2007). Citizen involvement efforts and bureaucratic responsiveness: Participatory values, stakeholder pressures, and administrative practicality. Public administration review, vol. 67 (2), 249-264.
Zhang, Y., & Yang, K. (2009). Citizen participation in the budget process: The effect of city managers, journal of budgeting, accounting & financial management, vol. 21(2), 289-317.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.