Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Economic Value Added: The Role of the Supply Chain Management Environment at LQ45 Indonesia
Keywords: Corporate social responsibility, Economic value added, Company size, SCME
Abstract
Purpose – This research examined the effect and strategy of CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) on EVA (Economic Value Added) using the SCME mechanism.
Methodology – Population data sets were derived from the index LQ45 for the period of August 2022 and compared to the previous six years. Furthermore, a purposive sampling technique was applied to conduct a regression analysis, while mediation used the Hayes process version 4.2, Model 8. The data set was compiled using information from IDX, Bloomberg, and Eikon platforms (Thomson Reuters).
Findings – The results highlighted four key conclusions, as follows: High CSR index companies observed a rise in EVA; SCME mediates the effects of CSR on EVA; Company size considerably modifies the effect of CSR on EVA; Company size significantly modifies the effect of CSR on SCME.
Originality – This research represents a novel attempt to investigate the relationship between CSR and EVA, the company size dimension's mediative role, and the SCME mediating role in Indonesia's LQ45 Index. The results present intriguing management, policy, and literature implications.
Downloads
References
Abdul, S., & Khan, R. (2017). The Companies ’ Sustainable Development. 99, 125–129.
Andries, P., & Faems, D. (2013). Patenting activities and firm performance: Does firm size matter? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(6), 1089–1098. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12047
Audia, P. G., & Greve, H. R. (2006). Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry. Management Science, 52(1), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0446
Awaysheh, A., Heron, R. A., Perry, T., & Wilson, J. I. (2020). On the relation between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3122
Bahri, M., St-Pierre, J., & Sakka, O. (2011). Economic value added: A useful tool for SME performance management. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60(6), 603–621. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401111150779
Bellandi, M. (2001). Local development and embedded large firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 13(3), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620110051103
Borsato, E., Tarolli, P., & Marinello, F. (2018). Sustainable patterns of main agricultural products combining different footprint parameters. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.044
Broadstock. (2019). Does corporate social responsibility impact firms’ innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental & social governance implementation and innovation performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(2), 366–374.
Broadstock, D. C., Matousek, R., Meyer, M., & Tzeremes, N. G. (2020). Does corporate social responsibility impact firms’ innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental & social governance implementation and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 119(April 2018), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.014
Brunnermeier, S. B., & Cohen, M. A. (2003). Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45(2), 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00058-X
Carrión-Flores, C. E., & Innes, R. (2010). Environmental innovation and environmental performance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 59(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2009.05.003
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039903800303
Church, R. M. (2002). The effective use of secondary data. Learning and Motivation, 33(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1006/lmot.2001.1098
Costantini, V., Crespi, F., Marin, G., & Paglialunga, E. (2017). Eco-innovation, sustainable supply chains and environmental performance in European industries We gratefully acknowledge the support by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 649186 – ISIGrowth. The c. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155, 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.038
Dang, C., (Frank) Li, Z., & Yang, C. (2018). Measuring firm size in empirical corporate finance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 86, 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.09.006
Dedrick, J., Kraemer, K., & Shih, E. (2013). Information technology and productivity in developed and developing countries. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(1), 97–122. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222300103
Deng, X., Long, X., Schuler, D. A., Luo, H., & Zhao, X. (2020). External corporate social responsibility and labor productivity: A S-curve relationship and the moderating role of internal CSR and government subsidy. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1877
Doh, J., Husted, B. W., & Yang, X. (2016). Guest Editors’ Introduction: Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Developing Country Multinationals. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(3), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.40
Doran, J., & Ryan, G. (2016). The Importance of the Diverse Drivers and Types of Environmental Innovation for Firm Performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(2), 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1860
Ehrenfeld, J. R. (2020). Industrial Ecology: A Strategic Framework for Product Policy and Other Industrial Ecology: A Strategic Framework for Product Policy and Other Sustainable Practices Prepared for Green Goods: The Second International Conference and Workshop on Product Or. August.
Ellram, L. M., & Tate, W. L. (2016). The use of secondary data in purchasing and supply management (P/SM) research. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22(4), 250–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2016.08.005
Escalera-Chávez, M. E., Rojas-Kramer, C. A., & García-Santillán, A. (2015). Financial decision and its relationship with economic value added. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 278–284. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n1p278
Esty, D. C., & Porter, M. E. (2002). Regulation and Performance: A Leading Indicator of Future Competitiveness ? Harvard Business School, Global Competitiveness Report, 78–100.
Fairchild, A. J., MacKinnon, D. P., Taborga, M. P., & Taylor, A. B. (2009). R2 effect-size measures for mediation analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 486–498. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.486
Fernandez-Gago, R., Cabeza-García, L. and Godos-Díez, J. L. (2020). How significant is corporate social responsibility to business research. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 21(1), 1–9.
Fernández-Gago, R., Cabeza-García, L., & Godos-Díez, J. L. (2020). How significant is corporate social responsibility to business research? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1809–1817. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1927
Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258. https://doi.org/10.5465/256324
Friedman, M. (2007). Friedman M. The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. In: Zimmerli W.C., Holzinger M., Richter K. (eds) Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. The New York Times Magazine, 2–6.
Gao, W., Wang, L., Yan, J., Wu, Y., & Musse, S. Y. (2021). Fostering workplace innovation through csr and authentic leadership: Evidence from sme sector. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(10), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105388
Gonzalez-Perez, M. A. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and international business: A conceptual overview. Advances in Sustainability and Environmental Justice, 11(2013), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2051-5030(2013)0000011006
Grimstad, S. M. F., Glavee-Geo, R., & Fjørtoft, B. E. (2020). SMEs motivations for CSR: an exploratory study. European Business Review, 32(4), 553–572. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-01-2019-0014
Hayes. (2013a). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: Methodology in the Social Sciences. 1–16.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). (2013b). Book Review. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach., 30(3), 511–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-4870(09)00046-4
Hult, G. T. M., Mena, J. A., Gonzalez-Perez, M. A., Lagerström, K., & Hult, D. T. (2018). A Ten Country-Company Study of Sustainability and Product-Market Performance: Influences of Doing Good, Warm Glow, and Price Fairness. Journal of Macromarketing, 38(3), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146718787017
Ibhagui, O.W. and Olokoyo, F. O. (2018). “Leverage and firm performance: New evidence on the role of firm size”, The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 45, pp. 57-82. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(2), 366–374.
Jakub, S., Viera, B., & Eva, K. (2015). Economic Value Added as a Measurement Tool of Financial Performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26(15), 484–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00877-1
Johnston, M. P. (2014). Secondary Data Analysis: A Method of which the Time Has Come. Qualitatve and Quantative Methods in Libraryes (QQML), 3, 619–626.
Josefy, M., Kuban, S., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. (2015). All Things Great and Small: Organizational Size, Boundaries of the Firm, and a Changing Environment. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 715–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2015.1027086
Jouini, F., & Messai, A. S. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and the corporate financial performance: The moderator role of firm size. International Journal of Critical Accounting, 11(3), 233. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijca.2020.109269
Karlsson, J. (2021a). Firm size and growth barriers: A data-driven approach. Small Business Economics, 57(3), 1319–1338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00350-y
Karlsson, J. (2021b). Firm size and growth barriers: A data-driven approach. Small Business Economics, 57(3), 1319–1338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00350-y
Kitzmueller, M., & Shimshack, J. (2012). Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(1), 51–84. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.50.1.51
Lantos, G. P. (2001). The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. In Journal of Consumer Marketing (Vol. 18, Issue 7). https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760110410281
Leal-Rodríguez, A. L., Eldridge, S., Roldán, J. L., Leal-Millán, A. G., & Ortega-Gutiérrez, J. (2015). Organizational unlearning, innovation outcomes, and performance: The moderating effect of firm size. Journal of Business Research, 68(4), 803–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.032
Li, S., Kinser, C., Ziara, R. M. M., Dvorak, B., & Subbiah, J. (2018). Environmental and economic implications of food safety interventions: Life cycle and operating cost assessment of antimicrobial systems in U.S. beef packing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 541–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.020
Liao, Z. (2018). Environmental policy instruments, environmental innovation and the reputation of enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 1111–1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.126
Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2010). Corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00277.x
Liu, X., Wang, C., Zhang, W., Suk, S., & Sudo, K. (2013). Awareness and acceptability of Chinese companies on market-based instruments for energy saving: A survey analysis by sectors. Energy for Sustainable Development, 17(3), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2012.11.008
Long, W., Li, S., Wu, H., & Song, X. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The roles of government intervention and market competition. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 525–541. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1817
McWilliams, A. and D. S. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective Authors ( s ): Abagail McWilliams and Donald Siegel Source: The Academy of Management Review , Vol. 26 , No. 1 ( Jan ., 2001 ), pp. 117-127 Published by: Academy of Management Stable. 26(1), 117–127.
McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Journal of Management Studies2, 43(1), 1–18.
Mittal, R. K., Sinha, N., & Singh, A. (2008). An analysis of linkage between economic value added and corporate social responsibility. Management Decision, 46(9), 1437–1443. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740810912037
Morsing, M., & Perrini, F. (2009). CSR in SMEs: Do SMEs matter for the CSR agenda? Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2009.01544.x
Palazzo, M., Vollero, A., & Siano, A. (2020a). From strategic corporate social responsibility to value creation: An analysis of corporate website communication in the banking sector. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 38(7), 1529–1552. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-04-2020-0168
Palazzo, M., Vollero, A., & Siano, A. (2020b). From strategic corporate social responsibility to value creation: An analysis of corporate website communication in the banking sector. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 38(7), 1529–1552. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-04-2020-0168
Porter, M. E., & Van Der Linde, C. (2017). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Corporate Environmental Responsibility, 9(4), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M. R. (2013). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, December, 1–13.
Rahman, A. A., Castka, P., & Love, T. (2019). Corporate social responsibility in higher education: A study of the institutionalisation of CSR in Malaysian public universities. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(4), 916–928. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1731
Raimi, L. (2017). Understanding theories of corporate social responsibility in the Ibero-American hospitality industry. Developments in Corporate Governance and Responsibility, 11, 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2043-052320170000011004
Richards, D. J. (2005). Implications for Environmental Design and Management. In Social Sciences.
Robert U. Ayres, U. E. S. (Ed. ). (1994). Provided in Cooperation with: WZB-Open Access Digitalisate.
Rosen, C. M., Bercovitz, J., & Beckman, S. (2001). Environmental Supply-Chain Management in the Computer Industry. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 4(4).
Sánchez-torné, I., & Alvarez, J. C. M.-. (2020). The importance of corporate social responsibility in achieving high corporate reputation. June, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1993
Schiessl, D., & Korelo, J. C. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and the impact on economic value added: The role of environmental innovation. 88887. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-03-2021-0071
Shahzad, M., Qu, Y., Javed, S. A., Zafar, A. U., & Rehman, S. U. (2020). Relation of Environmental Sustainability to Corporate Social Responsibility and Green Innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253, 1–12.
Sharma, A. K., & Kumar, S. (2010). Economic Value Added (EVA)—Literature Review and Relevant Issues. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2(2), 200–220. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v2n2p200
Shishany, A. Al, Al-Omush, A., & Guermat, C. (2020). The impact of economic value added (EVA) adoption on stock performance. Accounting, 6(5), 687–704. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2020.6.015
Smith, E. (2009). Using Secondary Data in Educational and Social Research. 40(4), 771–784.
Song, W., Wang, G. Z., & Ma, X. (2020). Environmental innovation practices and green product innovation performance: A perspective from organizational climate. Sustainable Development, 28(1), 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1990
Subedi, M., & Farazmand, A. (2020). Economic Value Added (EVA) for Performance Evaluation of Public Organizations. Public Organization Review, 20(4), 613–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-020-00493-2
Suripto. (2020). Manajemen Keuangan: Strategi penciptaan nilai perusahaan melalui pendekatan EVA. In Repository.Uin-Suska.Ac.Id.
Tapver, T., Laidroo, L., & Gurvitš-Suits, N. A. (2020). Banks’ CSR reporting – Do women have a say? Corporate Governance (Bingley), 20(4), 639–651. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-11-2019-0338
Theyel, G. (2000). Management practices for environmental innovation and performance. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20(2), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570010304288
Tortella, B. D., & Brusco, S. (2003). the Economic Value Added (Eva): An Analysis of Market Reaction. Advances in Accounting, 20(03), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0882-6110(03)20012-2
Tsai, K. H., & Wang, J. C. (2005). Does R&D performance decline with firm size? - A re-examination in terms of elasticity. Research Policy, 34(6), 966–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.017
Watson, R., Wilson, H. N., Smart, P., & Macdonald, E. K. (2018). Harnessing Difference: A Capability-Based Framework for Stakeholder Engagement in Environmental Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(2), 254–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12394
Williams, T. A., & Shepherd, D. A. (2017a). Mixed Method Social Network Analysis: Combining Inductive Concept Development, Content Analysis, and Secondary Data for Quantitative Analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), 268–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115610807
Williams, T. A., & Shepherd, D. A. (2017b). Mixed Method Social Network Analysis: Combining Inductive Concept Development, Content Analysis, and Secondary Data for Quantitative Analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), 268–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115610807
Windsor, D., & Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches Corporate Social Responsibility :
Yenipazarli, A., Vakharia, A., & Bala, R. (2020). Life-Cycle Approach to Environmental Innovation: Cost Structure, Advertising, and Competition. Decision Sciences, 51(4), 1015–1045. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12417
Copyright (c) 2022 Hana Nabilah Rahma, Hersugondo Hersugondo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.