PENGARUH KUALITAS PELAYANAN DAN KEPUASAN MAHASISWA TERHADAP INTENSI MEREGISTRASI ULANG MAHASISWA
Keywords: Apology, Attentiveness, Credibility, Facilitation, Redress, Repurchase Intention, Satisfaction, Service Quality, Timeliness
Abstract
This article is written based on the research about the influance of service quality and student’s satisfaction toward the intensity of student’s re-registration. This research is a replica of Davidow’s research regarding timeliness, apology, redress, facilitation, credibility and attentiveness as an indicator of service quality that could influence the satisfaction as well as the intention to repurchase. The analisys method that’s being used in this research is the hierarchy analisys method. By using this analisys, the causal relation between variable and the hierarchy of each variables, whether direct or indirect relations, can be estimated. The population of this research is the student of UT in UPBJJ all over Indonesia. The result of this research indicates that service quality’s factor has a significant influence toward the student’s satisfaction; student satisfaction’s factor has a significant influence toward the intensity of student’s re-registration; service quality factor has a significant influence toward the intensity of student’s re-registration; both service quality and student satisfaction’s factor don’t have a significant influence toward the intensity of student’s re-registration.
Downloads
References
Davidow, M. (2000). The bottom line impact of organizational responses to customer complains. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, Vol. 24, p. 473-490.
Fornell, C., Michael, J.D., Eugene, A.W., Joesung, C., & Barbara, B.E. (1996). The American customer satisfaction index: Nature, purpose, and finding. Journal Marketing. Vol. 60, Oktober, p. 7-18.
Kotler, P. (2000). Marketing management: Analysis, planning, implementation, and control. 9th Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall International, Inc.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., & Berry, L.L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and it’s implication for future research, in B.M. Enis & K.K. Cox (Eds). Marketing classisc: A selection of influencial articles. 7th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, p. 403-417
Raharso, S. (2004). Respon organisasi terhadap keluhan pelanggan untuk evaluasi pascakonsumen. Usahawan, No. 08, Thn. XXXIII, Agustus, p. 19-26.
Schiffman, L.G. & Kanuk, L.L. (1994). Consumer behavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
Setyawan, A.A. & Susila, I. (2004). Pengaruh service quality perception terhadap purchase intentions. Usahawan, No. 07, Thn. XXXIII, Juli, p. 29-37.
Sugiyono. (1999). Statistika untuk penelitian. Bandung: CV. Alvabela.
Supranto, J. (1996). Pengukuran tingkat kepuasan pelanggan. Usahawan, No. 04, Thn. XXV, April, p. 46-49.
Tjiptono, F. (1996). Manajemen jasa. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
Usmara, A. & Nugroho, E. P. (2000). Pengujian hubungan kualitas jasa, kepuasan nasabah, dan intensi pembelian ulang. Sosiohumanika, 13 (1), 215-228.
Zeithaml, V. A. & Bitner, M. J. (1996). Service marketing. Singapore: The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.