DISPARITAS EFISIENSI TEKNIS ANTAR SUB SEKTOR DALAM INDUSTRI MANUFAKTUR DI INDONESIA, APLIKASI DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS
Keywords: data envelopment analysis, disparity of technical efficiency, manufacture industry
Abstract
Efficiency is a parameter to measure performance quality of a company or agency, including manufacture industrial. One of tools was used to measure technical efficiency is Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). This article attempts to investigate the existence of difference technical efficiency between sub sector in manufacture industry in Indonesia period 1990-2002 using DEA. This estimation result discovered that the generally performance of manufacture sector industrial in Indonesia growth in spanning perception 1990 and 2002 relative stabilize altought have decrease percentage of efficiency in economic crisis. On the contrary, these conditions do not followed by disparity efficiency growth between sub sectors which exactly experience of negative growth at perception period. The fact sign that policy strategy industrialize during the time not improve yet high level productivity, but on the other hand policy strategy industrialize during the time have enough succeeded to develop equity level between sub sector in manufacture industry
Downloads
References
Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W.W. (1994). Some models for estimating technical and scale efficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30 (9), 1079-1092.
Charnes, A., W.Cooper, & E. Rhodes. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decission making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
Farrell, M.J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 120 (series A), 253-281.
Giufrida, A. & Gravelle, H. (2001). Measuring performance in primary care: Econometric analysis and DEA. Heslington York: Department of Economics and Related Studies University of York.
Insukindro, Nopirin, Makhfatih, A., & Ciptono, S.M. (2000). Laporan akhir: Pengukuran efisiensi relatif pelayanan kantor cabang pegadaian. Yogyakarta: Penelitian dan Pengembangan Manajemen (PPM) Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Jefferson, G.H. & Xu, W. (1994), Assessing gains in efficient production among China’s industrial enterprises. Economic Development and Culture Change, 3, 597-615.
Kost, F.E., & Rosenwig, J.E. (1979). Organization and management: A system and contingency approach. United States: McGraw-Hill Inc.
Muchdie. (1998). Permodelan struktur ruang ekonomi Indonesia: Penerapan prosedur giriot untuk menyusun tabel input output daerah. Ekonomi dan Keuangan Indonesia, XLVI (3), 279-305.
Post, T. & Spronk, J. (1999). Including economic uncertainty in data envelopment analysis: With an aplication of large european commercial banks. Finland: Helsinki School of Economics.
Sobari, A. (2002). Disparitas efisiensi teknis antar sub-sektor dalam industri manufaktur di Indonesia (1988-1998), sebuah analisis makro penerapan metode DEA. Thesis. Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta: unpublished.
Walter, N. (1995). Microeconomic theory basic principles and extensions. Dreyden Press: New York.
World Bank. (1994). Indonesia’s environment and development, challenges for the future. Washington DC.
World Bank. (1997). Indonesia – Sustaining high growth with equity. Report no. 16433-IND. Washington, D.C., 30 May.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.