The Fifth Coefficient Approximation of The Inverse Strongly Convex Function
Keywords: Fifth coefficient, inverse function, strongly convex function, univalent function
Abstract
This paper discusses the fifth coefficient approximation of the inverse strongly convex function. Strongly convex function is a subclass of convex function. Those functions are included as univalent functions. Using corresponding lemmas, we give sharp limits for the fifth coefficient of the inverse strongly convex function. The limit is sharp if the value of the approximation has the same value as the limit. We verify that the limit of the fifth coefficient of the inverse strongly convex function differs from that of the strongly convex function in some interval but still have the same value in a point. Besides, we also explain that the sharp limit of the fifth inverse coefficient is less than or equal to one.
Downloads
References
Arjevani, Y., Shalev-Shwartz, S., & Shamir, O. (2016). On Lower and Upper Bounds in Smooth and Strongly Convex Optimization. 17, 1–51.
Chihoro, E. T. (2022). Division by zero in real and complex number arithmetic and some of its implications. African Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science Research, 15(2), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajmcsr2020.0856
Cho, N. E., Kumar, V., & Park, J. H. (2018). The coefficients of powers of Bazilević functions. Mathematics, 6(11), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6110263
Cho, N. E., Kwon, O. S., & Sim, Y. J. (2021). Differential inequalities for spiral-like and strongly starlike functions. Advances in Difference Equations, 2021(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03670-9
Cichoń, M., Silindir, B., Yantir, A., & Gergün, S. (2023). Generalized Polynomials and Their Unification and Extension to Discrete Calculus. Symmetry, 15(9), 1677. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15091677
Daniswara, K. A., Marjono, & Bagus, E. w. r. (2020). The Fifth Coefficients of Strongly Convex Functions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1562(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1562/1/012006
Fitri, S., Marjono, Thomas, D. K., & Wibowo, R. B. E. (2020). Coefficient inequalities for a subclass of Bazilevič functions. Demonstratio Mathematica, 53(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1515/dema-2020-0040
Fleck, J. L., & Cassandras, C. G. (2017). Optimal design of personalized prostate cancer therapy using Infinitesimal Perturbation Analysis. Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems, 25, 246–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nahs.2016.08.005
Humble, N. (2023). A conceptual model of what programming affords secondary school courses in mathematics and technology. Education and Information Technologies, 28(8), 10183–10208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11577-z
John, M. H. (2003). Complex Analysis: Springer Undergraduate Mathematics Series. Springer.
Kwon, O. S., Thomas, D. K., & Sim, Y. J. (2020). The fifth coefficient of Bazilevič functions. Symmetry, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/SYM12081228
Lecko, A., & Sim, Y. J. (2017). A Note on the Fourth Coefficient of Strongly Starlike Functions. Results in Mathematics, 71(3–4), 1185–1189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00025-016-0540-0
Liang, Y. S., & Su, W. Y. (2023). A Geometric-Based Connection between Fractional Calculus and Fractal Functions. Acta Mathematica Sinica, English Series, October. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10114-023-1663-3
Lobato, F. S., Machado, V. S., & Steffen, V. (2016). Determination of an optimal control strategy for drug administration in tumor treatment using multi-objective optimization differential evolution. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 131, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.04.004
Marjono, Sokół, J., & Thomas, D. K. (2017). The Fifth and Sixth Coefficients for Bazilevič Functions B1(α). Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics, 14(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00009-017-0958-y
Marjono, & Thomas, D. K. (2019). On a subset of Bazilevič functions. Australian Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 16(2), 1–10.
Nasip, D. (2023). A new approach to the definitions and relationships between evolution science, basic sciences and mathematics. Magna Scientia Advanced Biology and Pharmacy, 9(1), 014–019. https://doi.org/10.30574/msabp.2023.9.1.0039
Ndemo, Z., & Mtetwa, D. (2021). Mathematics education undergraduates’ personal definitions of the notion of angle of contiguity in Kinematics. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 6(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v6i2.11130
Niezgoda, M. (2022). Inequalities of Sherman type involving both h1 -convex and h2 -concave functions with applications. Aequationes Mathematicae, 96(6), 1273–1283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00010-022-00915-0
Nunokawa, M., & Sokól, J. (2014). Remarks on some starlike functions. September. https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-593
Pang, L., Zhao, Z., & Song, X. (2016). Cost-effectiveness analysis of optimal strategy for tumor treatment. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 87, 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2016.03.032
Ravichandran, V., & Verma, S. (2015). Bound for the fifth coefficient of certain starlike functions. Comptes Rendus Mathematique, 353(6), 505–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crma.2015.03.003
Reséndis O, L. F., Tovar S, L. M., & Bravo O, Y. (2023). Conjugate complex harmonic functions. Arabian Journal of Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40065-023-00433-0
Riaz, A., Raza, M., & Thomas, D. K. (2022). Hankel determinants for starlike and convex functions associated with sigmoid functions. Forum Mathematicum, 34(1), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1515/forum-2021-0188
Saliu, A., Jabeen, K., Xin, Q., & Tchier, F. (2023). SS Symmetry Radius Results for Certain Strongly Starlike Functions. 1–12.
Sarason, D. (2007). Complex Function Theory (2nd ed.). American Mathematical Society.
Sarpong, P. K., Owusu-hemeng, A., & Ackora-prah, J. (2018). Applications of Convex Function and Concave Functions. 3(05), 1–14.
Schirn, M. (2023). Frege on the introduction of real and complex numbers by abstraction and cross-sortal identity claims. Synthese, 201(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04150-1
Sim, Y. J., & Thomas, D. K. (2020). On the Difference of Coefficients of Starlike and Convex Functions. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8091521
Srivastava, H. M., Khan, N., Darus, M., Rahim, M. T., Ahmad, Q. Z., & Zeb, Y. (2019). Properties of spiral-like close-to-convex functions associated with conic domains. Mathematics, 7(8), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7080706
Thomas, D. K. (2017). Coefficients of strongly alpha-convex and strongly gamma starlike functions. Tamkang Journal of Mathematics, 48(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.5556/j.tkjm.48.2017.2036
Thomas, D. K. (2022). Coefficient invariances of Convex functions. Mathematics Subject Classification. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.04929
Thomas, D. K., & Verma, S. (2017). Invariance of The Coefficients of Strongly Convex Functions. Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society, 95(3), 436–445. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972716000976
Trabka-Wiȩcław, K., & Zaprawa, P. (2018). On the coefficient problem for close-to-convex functions. Turkish Journal of Mathematics, 42(5), 2809–2818. https://doi.org/10.3906/mat-1711-36
Ullah, K., Srivastava, H. M., Rafiq, A., Arif, M., & Arjika, S. (2021). Open Access: A study of sharp coefficient bounds for a new subfamily of starlike functions. J Inequal Appl, 1, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-021-02729-1
Yadav, K. D. (2017). Exact Definition of Mathematics. International Research Journal of Mathematics, Engineering and IT, 4(1), 34–42.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Matematika Sains dan Teknologi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.