Kesiapan Kawasan Transit Solo Balapan dalam Pengembangan Transit Oriented Development

  • Bertania Kartikaning Tiyas Rosari Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Chrisna Trie Hadi Permana Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Murtanti Janti Rahayu Universitas Sebelas Maret

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33830/Reksabumi.v3i2.8144.2024

Keywords:

solo balapan, transit oriented development, transportasi

Abstract

The city of Surakarta is rapidly developing towards metropolitan, driving the formation of travel patterns to and from Surakarta where the station points become one of the main points. The role of Solo Balapan Station as the core transportation hub connecting Surakarta's internal and external areas has necessitated the design of an integrated transportation system with urban hubs or centers. Transit Oriented Development becomes an alternative concept designed to organize and develop activity centers in an area with land use variations integrated with urban transportation systems. Although some efforts have been shown as a seriousness of the government, it is not yet known for certain whether the characteristics of the supporting areas in the research area are ready to support the development of areas based on the TOD concept. This research is conducted in order to assess the extent to which the characteristics of supporting areas within an 800-meter radius around Solo Balapan Station support the development of the TOD concept. This research uses quantitative descriptive analysis through scoring analysis. The results show that the supporting area around Solo Balapan is not ready to support the development of the area with the Transit Oriented Development concept.

References

Anderson, L. T. (2018). Residential Density. Planning the Built Environment, May, 167–176. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351179430-14

Arifin, A. E. S., Surya, B., Salim, A., & Syafri. (2021). Fenomena Urban Sprawl Dan Pola Pergerakan Di Kota Makasar. Pusaka Almaida.

Bolton, M., Mcintyre, D., Teeters, M., & Hamilton, M. (2013). Transit Supportive Guidelines For the Chicagoland Region (Issue March). Pace. Transit Supportive Guidelines%0AFor the Chicagoland Region

Calthorpe, P. (1993). The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream. Princeton Architectural Press, New York.

Dittmar, H., dan G. Ohland. 2004. The New Transit Town Best Practice in Transit Oriented Development. Washington, DC: Island Press. Institute for Transportation & Development Policy, TOD Standard, New York, 2014.

Estupinan, Nicolas, Rodriguez, Daniel, (2008). The relationship between urban form and station boardings for Bogota's BRT. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(2), 296-306.

Florida Department of Transportation. (2011). Transit Oriented Development Design Guidelines. 0, 1–76.

Ibraeva, A., Correia, G. H. de A., Silva, C., & Antunes, A. P. (2020). Transit-oriented development: A review of research achievements and challenges. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 132, 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.10.018

ITDP. 2017. TOD Standard. https://www.itdp-indonesia.org/library/tod-standard-3/

Handy, S., & Boarnet, M. G. (2013). Impacts of Eco-driving on Passenger Vehicle Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Califonia Environmental Protection Agency, 2, 1–8. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/sb375/policies/density/residential_density_brief.pdfhttp://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/sb375/policies/density/residential_density_bkgd.pdf

Haryono. (2015). Comparative Analysis of Transportation System in America, England, and Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Transportasi Dan Logistik, 1(3), 492–509

Kementrian ATR/BPN 2017. Pedoman Pengembangan Kawasan Berorientasi Transit. Jakarta : Kementrian Agraria dan Tata Ruang/ Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional.

Kharismawan, R., Mahendra, A., Nugroho, S., & Rizqiyah, F. (2019). Tingkat Pemahaman Teori Intensitas PemanfaatanRuang pada Kuliah Dasar Perancangan Kota. Seminar Nasional Pembelajaran Arsitektur, January, 43–48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338711602

Kun, T. (2021). Study on the connection mode of comprehensive hub based on urban traffic network. E3S Web of Conferences, 283, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128302013

Lamour, Q., Morelli, A. M., & Marins, K. R. d. C. (2019). Improving walkability in a TOD context: Spatial strategies that enhance walking in the Belém neighbourhood, in São Paulo, Brazil. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 7(2), 280–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2019.03.005

Lee, C., You, S., & Huang, L. (2013). The influence of public facilities and environmental quality on residential satisfaction in Taiwan : Differences in neighborhood environment. African Journal of Business Management, 7(12), 915–925. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.947

MARTA. (2010). Transit-Oriented Development Guidelines. In MARTA. https://www.itsmarta.com/uploadedFiles/More/Transit_Oriented_Development/TOD Guidelines 2010-11.pdf

Matthews E., S., & Johnson, E. H. (2011). Public facilities. Handbook on Crime and Delinquency Prevention, 303–320.

Mulya, Q. P., Aliyah, I., & Yudana, G. (2022). Perubahan penggunaan lahan dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi di kawasan Jalan Ahmad Yani Kartasura berdasarkan persepsi masyarakat. Region : Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah Dan Perencanaan Partisipatif, 17(2), 237. https://doi.org/10.20961/region.v17i2.38660

Nugroho, R. H. (2021). Aplikasi ArcGIS Model Builder untuk Analisis Intensitas Pemanfaatan Ruang. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952., 5–24.

Nur Khaerat Nur, Parea Rusan Rangan, Mahyuddin, H. H., Miswar Tumpu, Gito Sugiyanto, L. E. R., & Siti Nurjanah Ahmad, E. E. R. (2021). Sistem Transportasi (Ronal Watrianthos & Janner Simarmata (ed.); Cetakan 1, Issue July). Yayasan Kita Menulis.

Pemerintah Kota Surakarta 2012. Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kota Surakarta (RTRW Kota Surakarta) 2011-2031. Surakarta : Pemerintah Daerah Kota Surakarta

Prakoso, R. M. B., & Sardjito, S. (2016). Kesesuaian Kawasan Transit Tramstop Surabaya Mass Rapid Transit dengan Konsep Transit Oriented Development (Studi Kasus: Koridor Embong Malang). Jurnal Teknik ITS, 5(1), 23-27. https://doi.org/10.12962/j23373539.v5i1.11180

Raditya, B., Soedwiwahjono, S., & Kusumastuti, K. (2023). Kesesuaian Kawasan Terminal Tirtonadi dan Stasiun Solo Balapan, Surakarta dari Perspektif Konsep TOD. Desa-Kota, 5(1), 133. https://doi.org/10.20961/desa-kota.v5i1.63521.133-147

Rosanti, D., Idris, A., & Kalalinggi, R. (2015). Penyediaan Fasilitas Publik Di Kota Tanjung Selor Sebagai Ibukota Provinsi Kalimantan Utara Dewi Rosanti 1 , Adam Idris 2 , Rita Kalalinggi 3. Administrative Reform, 3(2), 255–266.

Ruwaidah, E. (2016). Identifikasi Pemanfaatan Ruang Pada Koridor JL. Langko-Pejanggik-Selaparan Ditinjau Terhadap RTRW Kota Mataram. Jurnal Sangkareang Mataram, 2(1), 28-32.http://www.untb.ac.id

Shafira, R. A., & Nurlaela, S. (2021). Park and Ride South Quarter Sebagai Fasilitas Alih Moda di Kota Jakarta. Jurnal Teknik ITS, 9(2),154-157. https://doi.org/10.12962/j23373539.v9i2.53545

Siewwuttanagul, S., Noichan, R., Dewancker, B., Inohae, T., & Mishima, N. (2017). Identifying the arrangement of activities of corridor spaces in transit station. International Journal of Building Urban, Interior and Landscape Technology, 10, 18–26. https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/BUILT/article/view/117031

TCRP (Transit Cooperative Research Program). (2002). Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: A Literature Review. Washington DC: Transportation Research. (http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/tcrp/tcrp_rrd_52.pdf)

Published
2024-08-28
How to Cite
Rosari, B. K. T., Permana, C. T. H., & Rahayu, M. J. (2024). Kesiapan Kawasan Transit Solo Balapan dalam Pengembangan Transit Oriented Development. REKSABUMI, 3(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.33830/Reksabumi.v3i2.8144.2024
Section
Articles