Selayang Pandang Perbuatan Main Hakim Sendiri menurut Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33830/humaya.v4i1.6010Keywords:
Islamic law, Positive law, Vigilante actionAbstract
Violence usually occurs because of an incident that makes an individual or group of people anxious about another individual or group who commits a crime or causes trouble in their environment. Among them is the case that happened to Edwin Hermansyah Bin Suherman in Decision Number 8/Pid.B/2019/PN.Tgl. This paper tries to answer how the views of Islamic criminal law and positive law respond to the judge's decision regarding Decision Number 8/Pid.B/2019/PN.Tgl. This research is a normative research which contains a description of the problem under study based on cases taken from court decisions and legal literature as material for analysis using a case approach and literature techniques. The results of this study indicate that; First, the decision Number 8/Pid.B/2019/PN.Tgl stated that the sentence handed down by the judge was not in accordance with the concept of qisas in Islamic Criminal Law. Second, Indonesia's Positive Law views the actions of the Main Judge as included in the category of persecution where the punishment for perpetrators of ordinary abuse is regulated in the Criminal Code. Suggestions from this study are; First, every community should have legal awareness not to take vigilante actions because the judge is the one who has the right to adjudicate a problem. Second, restitution should be included in the sentence given to the Defendant so that the criminal law is more progressive by taking into account the loss and recovery of the victim.
References
Adila, Shavira. (2021). Pola Main Hakim Sendiri (Eigenrichting) Menurut Tinjauan Kriminologi. Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry.
Ali, Mahrus. (2015). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Sinar Grafika.
Aminullah, Muhammad. (2019). Etika Sosial Dalam Q.S. An-Nahl [16]:90 (Studi Penafsiran Kontekstual Abdullah Saeed). UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta.
Darussamin, Zikri. (2014). Qisas dalam Islam dan Relevansinya dengan Masa Kini. Asy-Syir’ah Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah dan Hukum, 48(1).
Doi, Abdurrahman. (2011). Keadilan Hukum Pidana Islam. Rajawali Press.
Efendi, Sumardi. (2020). Kejahatan Main Hakim Sendiri (Eigenrichting) menurut Hukum Positif dan Fiqh Jinayah. Legalite: Jurnal Perundang-Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 5(1), pp. 53–71. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v5i1.1819.
Fadillah, Rudy. (2019). Penegakan Hukum terhadap Tindakan Main Hakim Sendiri (Eigen Rechting) di Wilayah Polres Bantul. UIN Sunan Kalijaga. https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/36005/.
Hanafi, Ahmad. (1967). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Islam. Bulan Bintang.
Hendrawati, Heni, dan Johny Krisnan. (2019). Main Hakim Sendiri (Eigenrichting) dalam Perspektif Kriminologis. Proceeding of the URECOL, pp. 31–38. http://repository.urecol.org/index.php/proceeding/article/view/637.
Latifah, Marfuatul. (2011). Upaya Transformasi Konsep Jarimah Qisash-Diyat pada Hukum Positif melalui RUU KUHP. Negara Hukum, 2(1), pp. 129–50.
Lenti, Glenda Magdalena. (2018). Kejahatan terhadap Tubuh dalam Bentuk Penganiayaan menurut Pasal 351 Ayat 1 – 5 Kitab Undang – Undang Hukum Pidana. Lex Crimen, 7(4), pp. 55–62.
Kaudis, Dewi Misi. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Pelaku Pembunuhan dalam Keadaan Terpaksa untuk Membela Diri menurut Pasal 49 KUHP dan Pasal 338 KUHP. Lex Crimen, 10(3), pp. 63–71.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. (2008). Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar, Edisi Keempat. Liberty.
Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram University Press.
Nurfitrah, Ryan, dan Istiqamah. (2022). Analisis Kriminologis Terjadinya Perbuatan Main Hakim Sendiri. Alauddin Law Development Journal, 4(2), pp. 455–67. https://doi.org/10.24252/aldev.v4i2.19027.
Panjaitan, Chandro, dan Firman Wijaya. (2018). Penyebab Terjadinya Tindakan Main Hakim Sendiri atau Eigenrichting yang Mengakibatkan Kematian (Contoh Kasus Pembakaran Pelaku Pencurian Motor dengan Kekerasan di Pondok Aren Tangerang). Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 1(1), https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v1i1.2168.
Rahardjo, Dawam. (2018). Hukum Pidana di Indonesia: Antara Teori dan Praktik. Kencana Predana Media.
Rajafi, Ahmad. (2010). Qishash dan Maqashid Al-Syariah (Analisis Pemikiran Asy-Syathibi dalam Kitab Al-Muwafaqat). Jurnal Al-Syir’ah, 8(2), pp. 459–78.
Rinaldi, Kasmanto, Fajar Azhari, Ikhsan Alawi, Novita Sari, Rezky Nugraha, Sherly Andrika Putri, Ucok Matsudi, dan Hilda Mianita. (2022). Strategi Pencegahan Eigenrechting di Lingkungan Masyarakat. Sosiologi: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Budaya, 24(1).
Saiin, Asrizal, dan Ahmad Iffan. (2018). Fenomena Tindakan Main Hakim Sendiri dalam Hukum Negara dan Hukum Islam. Perada, 1(2), pp. 141–50. https://doi.org/10.35961/perada.v1i2.20.
Santoyo. (2008). Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 8(3), pp. 199–204. http://ejurnal.unisri.ac.id/index.php/RESPONSA/article/download/715/594.
Semiawan, Conny R. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (Jenis, Karakter, dan Keunggulannya). Grasindo.
Sengkey, Christania G. (2019). Tindakan Kekerasan dengan Tenaga Bersama terhadap Orang atau Barang menurut Pasal 170 KUHP sebagai Tindak Pidana Menghadapi Pengunjuk Rasa yang Rusuh. Lex Crimen, 8(7).
Soeroso. (2018). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Edisi Kesebelas. Sinar Grafika.
Soeskandi, Harry, dan Pujayanti, Nur. (2019). Pelaku Persekusi dan Tindakan Main Hakim Sendiri. Mimbar Keadilan, 14(28), pp. 237–46.
Suastini, N P M, dan I G N Parwata. (2019). Pemidanaan terhadap Pelaku Main Hakim Sendiri (Eigenrichting) dalam Kaitannya dengan Kontrol Sosial (Social Controlling). E-Journal Ilmu Hukum, pp. 1–15. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthawicara/article/download/50039/29782.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rohmatul Anam, Tazkia Amelia Fauzi, Tutut Dwi Setyorini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
