MODEL PENGEMBANGAN PROFESIONALSIME GURU BAHASA INGGRIS BERBASIS EVALUASI PROGRAM MUSYAWARAH GURU MATA PELAJARAN
Keywords: English language teacher, guru bahasa Inggris, model pengembangan profesional, professional development model
Abstract
This R & D-based study aims to (i) create a model of professional development of English Language Teacher (PDELT model), and (ii) identify the effectiveness of the model. The development procedure is based on the theory of Borg and Gall (1983), comprises 4 steps, namely (i) preliminary study, (ii) development of prototype, (iii) field test, and (iv) dissemination of results. Subjects were teachers of English Language as PDLET program participants, students involved, and 4 high school principals located in the district of Sragen, Central Java as represented public high school (SMAN) and Private High School. Results showed that the PDLET program should not rely on teacher training activities only, but should considered the non-training aspects, such as climate and working conditions in the school, group dynamics, and teacher's perception toward the program PDLET. Those aspects can create a conducive atmosphere that acts as a catalyst to improve the effectiveness of implementation model MGMP. The combination of training and educational activities simultaneously affect the change of teacher professionalism.
Penelitian R & D-base ini bertujuan untuk (i) menciptakan model pengembangan profesional guru Bahasa Inggris (PDELT model), dan (ii) mengidentifikasi efektivitas model. Prosedur pengembangan didasarkan pada teori Borg dan Gall (1983), terdiri dari 4 langkah, yaitu (i) studi pendahuluan, (ii) pengembangan prototipe, (iii) uji lapangan, dan (iv) diseminasi hasil. Subyek penelitian adalah guru Bahasa Inggris sebagai peserta program PDLET, siswa yang terlibat, dan 4 kepala sekolah tinggi yang terletak di distrik Sragen, Jawa Tengah yang diwakili sekolah menengah umum (SMAN) dan Sekolah Tinggi Swasta. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa program PDLET tidak harus bergantung pada kegiatan pelatihan guru saja, tetapi harus dianggap sebagai non-pelatihan aspek, seperti iklim dan kondisi kerja di sekolah, dinamika kelompok, dan persepsi guru terhadap PDLET program. Aspek-aspek dapat menciptakan suasana kondusif yang bertindak sebagai katalis untuk meningkatkan efektivitas pelaksanaan model MGMP. Kombinasi pelatihan dan kegiatan pendidikan secara simultan mempengaruhi perubahan profesionalisme guru.Downloads
References
Brown, H.D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed). San Fransisco: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 2002; pg. 947967.
Depdiknas. (2006a). Pedoman pelaksanaan revitalisasi KKG dan MGMP Jawa Tengah tahun 2006. Jakarta: Ditjen PMPTK & LPMP Jawa Tengah.
Depdiknas. (2006b). Paket pelatihan 4: Peningkatan mutu pendidikan dasar. Jakarta: Ditjen Dikdasmen.
Jalal, F. (2005) Teachers quality improvement in Indonesia: New paradigm and milestones. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Guskey, T.R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. California: Corwin Press.
Kikpatrick, D.L. (1996). Evaluating training programs. San Fransisco: Berrett-Koehler Publisher.
Sumardi, R. (2009). Problem Profesionalisme Guru dan Mutu Pendidikan. Diambil dari web http://robertsumardi.wordpress.com/2012/02/25/problema-profesionalisme-guru-dan-mutu-pendidikan-2/.
