Knowledge mapping of Computational Thinking and Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (CT+STEM)

Authors

  • Edi Supriyadi Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Bandung
  • Joseph Gacusan Taban University of Northern Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33830/ijdmde.v1i1.7599

Keywords:

Bibliometric, Computational Thinking, Scopus, STEM

Abstract

There are significant limitations in the current study on CT+STEM addressing the gaps noted in the existing literature. The study is driven by the lack of research on underrepresented students in college STEM courses, the inclusion of CT in STEM education at the entry level, and the insufficiency of teacher training programs that concentrate on integrating computational thinking into STEM classrooms. It aims to fill the knowledge gap about how CTs' professional experience influences their attitudes and practices. The study acknowledges the necessity of empirical research to explore the balance between the widespread use of critical thinking and the distinct characteristics of scientific representations, a significant obstacle in educational planning. The research utilizes bibliometric analysis to cover the period from 1978 to 2023, showing a steady yearly growth rate of 7.22% in the CT+STEM sector. The collection consists of 241 documents from 127 scholarly sources, highlighting collaboration trends and worldwide relationships in CT+STEM research. The study highlights important publications, authors, affiliations, and highly cited papers while also recognizing potential bias and the quantitative character of the investigation. The study has important implications for education, industry, and problem-solving in the digital era. The article suggests further research to investigate qualitative aspects, methodologies, and teaching strategies to enhance the development and influence of CT+STEM in the evolving field of education and technology.

References

Agbo, F., Oyelere, S., Suhonen, J & Adewumi, S. (2019). A systematic review of computational thinking approach for programming education in higher education institutions. In Proceedings of the 19th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (pp. 1-10). https://doi.org/10.1145/3364510.3364521

García-Peñalvo, F., Conde, M., Gonçalves, J & Lima, J. (2021). Current trends in robotics in education and computational thinking. In Ninth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM'21) (pp. 9-12). https://doi.org/10.1145/3486011.3486411

Kallia, M., Borkulo, S., Drijvers, P., Barendsen, E & Tolboom, J. (2021). Characterizing computational thinking in mathematics education: a literature-informed Delphi study. Research in Mathematics Education, 23(2), 159-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2020.1852104

Korkmaz, Ö & Bai, X. (2019). Adapting computational thinking scale (CTS) for Chinese high school students and their thinking scale skills level. Participatory Educational Research, 6(1), 10-26. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.19.2.6.1

Lee, I., Grover, S., Martin, F., Pillai, S & Malyn-Smith, J. (2019). Computational thinking from a disciplinary perspective: integrating computational thinking in k-12 science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09803-w

Lyon, J. & Magana, A. (2020). Computational thinking in higher education: a review of the literature. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(5), 1174-1189. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22295

Psycharis, S & Kotzampasaki, E. (2019). The impact of a stem inquiry game learning scenario on computational thinking and computer self-confidence. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103071

Rich, P. and Hodges, C. (2017). Emerging research, practice, and policy on computational thinking. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1

Soltanian, S. and Dehghani, H. (2018). Boris: a key regulator of cancer stemness. Cancer Cell International, 18(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-018-0650-8

Agbo, F. J., Oyelere, S. S., Suhonen, J., & Adewumi, S. E. (2019). A Systematic Review of Computational Thinking Approach for Programming Education in Higher Education Institutions. In Proceedings of the 19th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (pp. 1-10). https://doi.org/10.1145/3364510.3364521

Basu, S., Biswas, G., Sengupta, P., Dickes, A., Kinnebrew, J. S., & Clark, D. (2016). Identifying middle school students’ challenges in computational thinking-based science learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0036-2

Bers, M. U. (2018). Coding and Computational Thinking in Early Childhood: The Impact of ScratchJr in Europe. European Journal of Stem Education. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/3868

Chen, W., Ahmed, M., Sofiah, W. I., Mat Isa, N. A., Ebrahim, N. A., & Hai, T. (2021). A Bibliometric Statistical Analysis of the Fuzzy Inference System - Based Classifiers. Ieee Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3082908

Chen, Y.-C., Tsui, P.-L., & Lee, C.-S. (2021). Is mathematics required for cooking? An interdisciplinary approach to integrating computational thinking in a culinary and restaurant management course. Mathematics, 9(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9182219

Ching, Y.-H., & Hsu, Y.-C. (2023). Educational Robotics for Developing Computational Thinking in Young Learners: A Systematic Review. Techtrends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00841-1

Ching, Y.-H., Hsu, Y.-C., & Baldwin, S. (2018). Developing Computational Thinking with Educational Technologies for Young Learners. TechTrends, 62(6), 563 – 573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0292-7

Chondrogiannis, E., Symeonaki, E., Papachristos, D., Loukatos, D., & Arvanitis, K. G. (2021). Computational thinking and stem in agriculture vocational training: A case study in a greek vocational education institution. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 11(1), 230–250. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe11010018

Eguchi, A. (2016). RoboCupJunior for promoting STEM education, 21st-century skills, and technological advancement through robotics competition. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 692 – 699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2015.05.013

English, L. D. (2017). Advancing Elementary and Middle School STEM Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15, 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9802-x

Gunadi, F., Sudirman, S., Runisah, R., Senjaya, A., & Mustari, S. (2023, February). Impact of STEM Learning (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) on Students’ Mathematics Thinking Ability: Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 2nd Multidisciplinary International Conference, MIC 2022, 12 November 2022, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia.

Guzey, S. S., Moore, & Harwell, M. R. (2016). Building Up STEM: An Analysis of Teacher-Developed Engineering Design-Based STEM Integration Curricular Materials. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-Peer). https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1129

Hinojo Lucena, F. J., Dúo-Terrón, P., Navas-Parejo, M. R., Rodríguez-Jiménez, C., & Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J. (2020). Scientific Performance and Mapping of the Term STEM in Education on the Web of Science. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062279

Ioannou, A., & Makridou, E. (2018). Exploring the potentials of educational robotics in the development of computational thinking: A summary of current research and practical proposal for future work. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2531–2544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9729-z

Jaipal-Jamani, K., & Angeli, C. (2017). Effect of Robotics on Elementary Preservice Teachers’ Self-Efficacy, Science Learning, and Computational Thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(2), 175 – 192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9663-z

Jeong, S., & Kim, H. (2015). The effect of a climate change monitoring program on students’ knowledge and perceptions of STEAM education in Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(6), 1321–1338. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1390a

Knie, L., Standl, B., & Schwarzer, S. (2022). First experiences of integrating computational thinking into a blended learning in-service training program for STEM teachers. Computer Applications in Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22529

Law, K. E., Karpudewan, M., & Zaharudin, R. (2021). Computational Thinking in STEM Education Among Matriculation Science Students. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education. https://doi.org/10.21315/apjee2020.36.1.10

Lee, I., Grover, S., Martin, F., Pillai, S., & Malyn-Smith, J. (2019). Computational Thinking From a Disciplinary Perspective: Integrating Computational Thinking in K-12 Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09803-w

Leonard, J., Buss, A., Gamboa, R., Mitchell, M., Fashola, O. S., Hubert, T., & Almughyirah, S. (2016). Using Robotics and Game Design to Enhance Children’s Self-Efficacy, STEM Attitudes, and Computational Thinking Skills. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(6), 860 – 876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9628-2

Liu, X., Wang, X., Ke-Xue, X., & Hu, X. (2023). Effect of Reverse Engineering Pedagogy on Primary School Students’ Computational Thinking Skills in STEM Learning Activities. Journal of Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11020036

Manches, A., & Plowman, L. (2017). Computing education in children’s early years: A call for debate. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(1), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12355

Moon, J., & Park, Y. (2022). Exploring South Korean Elementary School Classroom Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices in Physical Education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215033

Osztián, P. R., Kátai, Z., & Osztián, E. (2022). On the Computational Thinking and Diagrammatic Reasoning of First-Year Computer Science and Engineering Students. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.933316

Peel, A., Sadler, T. D., & Friedrichsen, P. (2022). Algorithmic Explanations: an Unplugged Instructional Approach to Integrate Science and Computational Thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(4), 428 – 441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09965-0

Psycharis, S., & Kotzampasaki, E. (2019). The Impact of a STEM Inquiry Game Learning Scenario on Computational Thinking and Computer Self-Confidence. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103071

Repenning, A., Webb, D. C., Koh, K. H., Nickerson, H., Miller, S. B., Brand, C., Horses, I. H. M., Basawapatna, A., Gluck, F., Grover, R.,

Gutierrez, K., & Repenning, N. (2015). Scalable game design: A strategy to bring systemic computer science education to schools through game design and simulation creation. ACM Transactions on Computinig Education, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1145/2700517

Richardo, R., Dwiningrum, S. I. A., Wijaya, A., Retnawati, H., Wahyudi, A., Sholihah, D. A., & Hidayah, K. N. (2023). The impact of STEM attitudes and computational thinking on 21st-century via structural equation modelling. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(2), 571 – 578. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i2.24232

Sengupta, P., Kinnebrew, J. S., Basu, S., Biswas, G., & Clark, D. (2013). Integrating computational thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation: A theoretical framework. Education and Information Technologies, 18(2), 351–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9240-x

Supriyadi, E., Suryadi, D., Turmudi, T., Prabawanto, S., Juandi, D., & Dahlan, J. A. (2023). Didactical design research: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 18(Special Issue), 153–160. https://jestec.taylors.edu.my/Special Issue ISCoE 2022_2/ISCoE 2_20.pdf

Supriyadi, E., Turmudi, T., Dahlan, J. A., Juandi, D., Istikomah, E., Febriandi, R., & Sholikhakh, R. A. (2023). Global trend of ethnoscience research: a bibliometric analysis using scopus database. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 18 (Special Issue), 1–8. https://jestec.taylors.edu.my/Special Issue ISCoE 2022_2/ISCoE 2_01.pdf

Theobald, E. J., Hill, M. J., Tran, E., Agrawal, S., Arroyo, E. N., Behling, S., Chambwe, N., Cintrón, D. L., Cooper, J. D., Dunster, G. P., Grummer, J. A., Hennessey, K. M., Hsiao, J., Iranon, N. N., Jones, L., Jordt, H., Keller, M., Lacey, M. E., Littlefield, C. E., … Freeman, S. (2020). Active Learning Narrows Achievement Gaps for Underrepresented Students in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(12), 6476-6483. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117

Troiano, G. M., Snodgrass, S., Argımak, E., Robles, G., Smith, G., Cassidy, M., Tucker-Raymond, E., Puttick, G., & Harteveld, C. (2019). Is My

Game OK Dr. Scratch? Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 208–219. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311927.3323152

Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5

Yang, D., & S. Chittoori, B. C. (2022). Technology-supported engineering design and problem-solving for elementary students. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 6(4):524-542. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.406

Yata, C., Ohtani, T., & Isobe, M. (2020). Conceptual framework of STEM-based on Japanese subject principles. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00205-8

Downloads

Published

2024-04-24

How to Cite

Supriyadi, E., & Taban, J. G. (2024). Knowledge mapping of Computational Thinking and Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (CT+STEM). International Journal of Didactic Mathematics in Distance Education, 1(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.33830/ijdmde.v1i1.7599

Issue

Section

Articles