This is an outdated version published on 29-12-2023. Read the most recent version.

Lobbying and Negotiation Techniques to Enhance Business Communication Skills through Virtual Reality Training: A Preliminary Study

Authors

Adisthy Nurqamarani Universitas Terbuka
Ari Juliana Universitas Terbuka
Rachmawati Windyaningrum Universitas Terbuka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33830/ptjj.v24i2.5586.2023

Keywords:

virtual reality, distance education, lobbying, negotiation

Abstract

Lobbying and negotiation skills are some of the required skills to succeed in business and social life. Conventional universities may develop their students’ skills through real-life scenarios while this could be challenging for open and distance universities which students are scattered around the world. Virtual Reality is an alternative technology that allows students to experience real-life scenarios in a simulated environment. This research aims to develop website-based Virtual Reality training to enhance learning in the business communication subject, with a specific focus on lobbying and negotiation techniques in distance education. This research adopts the Borg & Gall Research & Development (R&D) Method for educational research. This paper focuses on the preliminary stage which gathered the data required to construct a high-quality mood board and flowchart aligned with stakeholder needs to produce high-quality virtual reality training to enhance negotiation skills. Primary data is gathered through Focus Group Discussions involving students, tutors, and business communication practitioners. Additionally, secondary data is derived from extensive literature and document reviews, including relevant studies and documents. The result shows that informants are passionate about the idea of using virtual reality to enhance negotiation skills. Options of background, gender, and situation settings as well as interchangeable roleplay are preferred in boosting the motivation and enhancing the practical knowledge of negotiation skills.

References

Belawati, T. (2000). Pendidikan terbuka dan jarak jauh. Universitas Terbuka.

Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1983). Education research: an introduction (4th Edition). Longman Inc.

Broekens, J., Harbers, M., Brinkman, W.-P., Jonker, C. M., Bosch, K. van den, & Meyer, J.-J. Ch. (2012). Virtual reality negotiation training increases negotiation knowledge and skill. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33197-8_23

Core, M., Traum, D., Lane, H. C., Swartout, W., Gratch, J., Van Lent, M., & Marsella, S. (2006). Teaching Negotiation Skills through Practice and Reflection with Virtual Humans. Simulation, 82(11), 685–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549706075542

Fadilla, S., Juliana, A., Nurqamarani, A. S., Bisnis, P. A., & Artikel, R. (2023). PENERAPAN MANAJEMEN PENGETAHUAN DI PERGURUAN TINGGI TERBUKA DAN JARAK JAUH INFO ARTIKEL ABSTRAK. 14(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.31764

Holuša, V., Vaněk, M., Beneš, F., Švub, J., & Staša, P. (2023). Virtual Reality as a Tool for Sustainable Training and Education of Employees in Industrial Enterprises. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712886

Huitt, W. (2011). Bloom et al.’s Taxonomy of the Cognitive Domain. http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/cogsys/bloom.html

ImaginusVR. (2021). Why 3D Models are Great for Education | by ImaginusVR | Medium. https://medium.com/@ImaginusVR/why-3d-models-are-great-for-education-692b2f9c03ab

Iriantara, Yosal, Tatang Subarna, & Saeful Rochman. (2008). Modul Komunikasi Bisnis (2nd ed.). Pusat Penerbitan Universitas Terbuka.

Juliana, A., Shabrina Nurqamarani, A., Fadila, S., & Aripin, S. (2022). Virtual Reality in Business Education: Systematic Literature Review. Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan , 51(1). http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/LIK

Kavanagh, S., Luxton-Reilly, A., Wuensche, B., & Plimmer, B. (2017). A systematic review of Virtual Reality in education. Themes in Science & Technology Education, 10(2), 85–119.

Krokos, E., Plaisant, C., & Varshney, A. (2019). Virtual memory palaces: immersion aids recall. Virtual Reality, 23(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0346-3

Lewicki, R. J. , B. B. and S. D. M. (2020). Negotiation (8th ed.). McGraw Hill.

McGovern, E., Moreira, G., & Luna-Nevarez, C. (2020a). An application of virtual reality in education: Can this technology enhance the quality of students’ learning experience? Journal of Education for Business, 95(7), 490–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2019.1703096

McGovern, E., Moreira, G., & Luna-Nevarez, C. (2020b). An Application of Virtual Reality in Education: Can This Technology Enhance the Quality of Students’ Learning Experience? In Journal of Education for Business (Vol. 95, Issue 7, pp. 490–496).

Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers and Education, 70, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033

Nurbadi, M. S. (2018). Aplikasi Berbasis Virtual Reality untuk Mendukung Proses Pembelajaran Organ Pencernaan Manusia. Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi, 2(3), 12–15. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/11883

Priyatna, S. dan E. A. (2009). Tujuh Pilar Komunikasi Bisnis. Widya Padjajaran.

Sumartias, S. (2016). Komunikasi Bisnis. Universitas Terbuka.

Whitton, N. (2013). Games for Learning. International Review of Qualitative Research, 6(3), 424–439. https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2013.6.3.424

Young, G. W., Stehle, S., Walsh, B. Y., & Tiri, E. (2020). Exploring Virtual Reality in the Higher Education Classroom: Using VR to Build Knowledge and Understanding. In Journal of Universal Computer Science (Vol. 26, Issue 8).

Downloads

Published

29-12-2023

Versions

How to Cite

Nurqamarani, A., Juliana, A., & Windyaningrum, R. (2023). Lobbying and Negotiation Techniques to Enhance Business Communication Skills through Virtual Reality Training: A Preliminary Study. Jurnal Pendidikan Terbuka Dan Jarak Jauh, 24(2), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.33830/ptjj.v24i2.5586.2023