Reviewer Guideline

Reviewers play a vital role in ensuring the quality and integrity of the research we publish. To maintain a high standard of excellence, we request that our reviewers adhere to the following guidelines:

1. Expertise and Relevance
Review manuscripts only in your area of expertise and familiarity. If you feel that you lack the necessary expertise to review a particular manuscript, kindly inform the editor promptly.

2. Timeliness
Reviewers are an essential part of the publication process, and we greatly appreciate your commitment to timely reviews. Please respond promptly to review invitations and complete your reviews within the agreed-upon timeframe.

3. Confidentiality
Treat all manuscripts as confidential documents. Do not share, discuss, or disclose any information from the manuscript to anyone without the explicit permission of the journal and the authors. This includes sharing the manuscript or its content before publication.

4. Conflict of Interest
Avoid reviewing manuscripts in which you have conflicts of interest, whether personal, professional, or financial. If you have any doubts about potential conflicts, please contact the editor for guidance.

5. Objectivity and Constructive Feedback
Provide an objective and unbiased evaluation of the manuscript. Focus on the scientific merits, methodology, data analysis, and interpretation of results. Offer constructive feedback that will help the authors enhance the quality of their work.

6. Ethical Concerns
Alert the editor if you identify any potential ethical concerns, such as plagiarism, data fabrication, or unethical research practices. Provide specific details and, if possible, offer suggestions for addressing these concerns.

7. Clarity and Precision
Ensure that your review is clear, concise, and well-organized. Clearly state your major points, concerns, and recommendations. If appropriate, provide references to support your comments or suggestions.

8. Respectful and Professional Conduct
Maintain a respectful and professional tone throughout your review. Avoid personal criticism or derogatory remarks about the authors. Focus on the scientific content and maintain a constructive approach.

9. Suggestions for Improvement
Provide specific suggestions for improving the manuscript, if necessary. Offer guidance on how the authors can strengthen their arguments, expand their research, or address any limitations.

10. Ethical Obligations
Report any suspected ethical violations or misconduct to the editor. This includes concerns about data integrity, conflicts of interest, or any other potential breaches of research ethics.