KEMAMPUAN MENYELESAIKAN SOAL MATA KULIAH STATISTIK EKONOMI II

Authors

  • Zainur Hidayah Universitas Terbuka
  • Lely Fera Triani Universitas Terbuka

Keywords:

long-distance learning, long-distance learning students, conventional students

Abstract

Long-distance learning system has been known in Indonesia far before UT was establised in 1984. The questioning differences between long-distance learning system and conventional system still persist until today. This question is co-related with the doubt of how to implement the long-distance learning system with very large number of students across the nations who are far from the source of learning, and with ununified compentency of the program input. This research is using non-parametric statistics to identify differences of student ability between UT students, X University students, and Y University students, in answering essays of Economic Statistics II measured in 2 categories: comparing question patterns and test results done by students from different universities. For the face-to-face or conventional system, this study use two different institution, X university and Z university, so the comparisons can be done twice to two a different and the same systems. There are 49 respondents that consists of 20 undergraduate students of X university, 19 undergraduate students of Y university, and 10 undergraduate students of UT. The data collected will be analyzed using non-parametric statistics, the Chi-Square Method. From the testing process standpoint, there is no significant difference among students of UT, University X, and Unversity Y. And also between students university X and unversity Y. From the testing result standpoint, students of UT, University X, and Unversity Y show relatively the same result with a degree 95%

References

Andriani, D. & Pangaribuan, N. (2006). Mahasiswa di institusi pendidikan tinggi jarak jauh: Kajian teoritis dan kondisi lapangan. Jakarta: LPPM, Universitas Terbuka.

Clark, H. (1981). Secondary and middle school teaching methods. New York: Macmillan.

Knowles, M. (1978). The adult learner. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.

Padmo, D. & Anggoro, M.T. (2002). Persepsi dan kesediaan mahasiswa dan calon mahasiswa potensial PTJJ dalam pemanfaatan media dan sumber belajar. Jakarta: Pusat Studi Indonesia, Lembaga Penelitian, Universitas Terbuka.

Puspitasari, A & Islam. (2003). Kesiapan belajar mandiri mahasiswa dan calon mahasiswa pada pendidikan jarak jauh di Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Studi Indonesia, Lembaga Penelitian, Universitas Terbuka.

Puspitasari, A. (2004). Evaluasi hasil belajar. Dalam Assandhimitra, dkk (ed) Pendidikan Tinggi Jarak Jauh. (hal.315-353). Jakarta: Pusat Penerbitan, Universitas Terbuka.

Subagjo. (1999). Pendidikan Terbuka dan Jarak Jauh, Program Akademik Universitas Terbuka. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.

Sunardjo, J. & Kamsir. (2004). Motivasi mahasiswa masuk Program S1 PGSD-UT di wilayah kerja UPBJJ UT Purwokerto. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Kelembagaan, Lembaga Penelitian, Universitas Terbuka.

Suparman, A. (2004). Universitas Terbuka memasuki era Gelora Simintas tahun 2004. Jakarta: Pusat Penerbitan, Universitas Terbuka

Suparman, A & Zuhairi, A. (2004). Pendidikan Jarak Jauh, Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta: Pusat Penerbitan, Universitas Terbuka.
The Institute for Higher Education Policy. (1999). What’s the difference? A review of contemporary reserach on the efectiveness of distance learning in higher education.

Downloads

Published

08-09-2007

How to Cite

Hidayah, Z. ., & Triani, L. F. (2007). KEMAMPUAN MENYELESAIKAN SOAL MATA KULIAH STATISTIK EKONOMI II. Jurnal Pendidikan Terbuka Dan Jarak Jauh, 8(2), 128–135. Retrieved from https://jurnal.ut.ac.id/index.php/jptjj/article/view/543

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.