Quality Assurance for STEM Education
School Inspection Practices and Implementation Challenges in Cambodia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33830/ijrse.v8i2.15897Keywords:
STEM education, Educational quality assurance, School inspection practices, School leadership, Institutional capacity, Educational improvementAbstract
Educational quality assurance is essential for strengthening institutional conditions that support effective teaching and learning, including STEM education. However, the effectiveness of school inspection depends not only on compliance with evaluation procedures but also on school leaders’ capacity to implement recommendations for institutional improvement. This study examines school inspection practices, principals’ engagement with inspection recommendations, and implementation challenges in lower secondary schools in Cambodia. Employing quantitative data collected from 38 teachers. Teachers’ ratings indicated favorable perceptions of principals’ inspection-related practices before (M = 4.16, SD = 0.70), during (M = 4.05, SD = 0.74), and after inspections (M = 3.91, SD = 0.82). Perceived engagement with inspection recommendations was also positive (M = 4.01, SD = 0.78). Nevertheless, implementation was constrained by limited financial and human resources, delayed inspection reports, insufficient communication of findings, limited community involvement, and infrequent follow-up inspections. The findings highlight a distinction between positive engagement with quality assurance procedures and the institutional capacity to translate inspection feedback into sustained improvement. For STEM education, this distinction underscores the importance of examining whether school quality assurance systems provide the organizational and instructional conditions necessary to support effective teaching and learning. The study contributes context-sensitive evidence to international discussions on educational quality assurance while identifying implementation conditions that warrant further investigation in STEM-specific settings.
References
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
ASEAN. (2025). ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community Blueprint 2025. ASEAN Secretariat.
Atik, S., & Çelik, O. T. (2022). Analysis of the relationships between academic motivation, engagement, burnout, and academic achievement with structural equation modelling. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8(2), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.826088
Behnke, K., & Steins, G. (2017). Principals’ reactions to feedback received by school inspection: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Change, 18, 77–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-016-9275-7
Braun, C., & Busuioc, M. (2020). Stakeholder engagement as a conduit for regulatory legitimacy? Journal of European Public Policy, 27(11), 1599–1611. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1817133
Delors, J., Al Mufti, I., Amagi, I., Carneiro, R., Chung, F., Geremek, B., Gorham, W., Kornhauser, A., Manley, M., Quero, M. P., Savané, M.-A., Singh, K., Stavenhagen, R., & Nanzhao, Z. (1996). Learning: The treasure within: Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century. UNESCO.
Ehren, M. C. M., Eddy-Spicer, D., Bangpan, M., & Khatwa, M. (2016). School inspections in low- and middle-income countries: Explaining impact and mechanisms of impact. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2016.1239188
Ehren, M., Hutchinson, J., & Muñoz-Chereau, B. (2023). Place-based disparities faced by stuck schools in England: A contextual understanding of low performance and the role of inspection outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 34(4), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2023.2238698
Education Quality Inspection Department. (2021a). Quality assurance inspection system manual for capital and provinces.
Education Quality Inspection Department. (2021b). School inspection handbook: Guidance for regular school inspection.
Fathoni, M. A. (2026). What drives Indonesian people to purchase modest fashion. F1000Research. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.173033.1
Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (1993). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Gaertner, H., Wurster, S., & Pant, H. A. (2014). The effect of school inspections on school improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(4), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2013.811089
Gardezi, S., McNamara, G., Brown, M., & O’Hara, J. (2023). School inspections: A rhetoric of quality or reality? Frontiers in Education, 8, 1204642. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1204642
Goor, M. B., Schwenn, J. O., & Boyer, L. (1997). Preparing principals for leadership in special education. Intervention in School and Clinic, 32(3), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/105345129703200303
Grigoryan, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2021). Values and attitudes towards cultural diversity: Exploring alternative moderators of the value–attitude link. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(6), 966–981.
Gustafsson, J. E., Ehren, M. C., Conyngham, G., McNamara, G., Altrichter, H., & O’Hara, J. (2015). From inspection to quality: Ways in which school inspection influences change in schools. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 47, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.07.002
Hare, J. (2006). Towards an understanding of holistic education in the middle years of education. Journal of Research in International Education, 5(3), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240906069453
Hashim, A. K., Torres, C., & Kumar, J. M. (2023). Is more autonomy better? How school actors perceive school autonomy and effectiveness in context. Journal of Educational Change, 24(2), 183–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09439-x
Harvey, L. (2006). Impact of quality assurance: Overview of a discussion between representatives of external quality assurance agencies. Quality in Higher Education, 12(3), 287–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320601051010
Klerks, M. (2013). The effect of school inspections: A systematic review. School Improvement, 2–32.
Mam, C., Lanteli, E., Kato, J., Iwayama, T., & Shimizu, H. (2019). School performance evaluation through systemic school inspection in Cambodia.
Martins, A. (2022). Green marketing and perceived SME profitability: The mediating effect of green purchase behaviour. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 33(2), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-04-2021-0074
Min, G., Lin, M., Liu, Y., Yang, N., & Li, Z. (2023). Research on the evaluation model of school management quality in the compulsory education stage based on big data technology. Sustainability, 15(13), 9987. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15139987
Mittal, R. K., Garg, N., & Yadav, S. K. (2018). Quality assessment framework for educational institutions in technical education: A literature survey. On the Horizon, 26(3), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-08-2017-0066
MoEYS. (2007). Law on education in Cambodia.
MoEYS. (2019a). Cambodia education roadmap 2030: Sustainable Development Goal 4.
MoEYS. (2024). Education strategic plan 2024–2028.
MoEYS. (2026). Inspection system to improve school standards.
Ngoc Tuong Nguyen, T., & Thi Kim Oanh, D. (2025). Cooperative learning and its influence on student engagement. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2513414. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2513414
NIE. (2017). Training course for experienced education inspectors on the new education inspection system.
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Ólafsdóttir, B., Jónasson, J. T., & Sigurðardóttir, A. K. (2022). Use and impact of external evaluation feedback in schools. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 74, 101181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101181
Om, S. (2025). School directorship: Effective leadership and management practices and challenges in primary schools in Cambodia. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 28(4), 696–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2022.2042857
Pellanda, A. C. (2024). SDG 4 in dispute: Between the right to education and the human capital agenda. In The quest for the Sustainable Development Goals: Living experiences in territorializing the 2030 Agenda in Brazil (pp. 125–137). Springer.
Quesel, C., Schweinberger, K., & Möser, G. (2021). Responses to positive and negative feedback on organizational aspects of school quality: Teachers’ and leaders’ views on a Swiss traffic light approach to school inspection. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(3), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1856886
Quintelier, A., De Maeyer, S., & Vanhoof, J. (2020). The role of feedback acceptance and gaining awareness on teachers’ willingness to use inspection feedback. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32(3), 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09325-9
Rahmani, A. (2026). Public administration capacity, collaborative governance, and sustainable development. International Journal of Social Science Research, 3(3), 685–695. https://doi.org/10.70558/IJSSR.2026.v3.i3.301135
Ramadan, R. S., & Ismail, O. A. (2023). Building a better future: The role of school inspection in driving educational excellence. In Restructuring leadership for school improvement and reform (pp. 202–221). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417–2431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
Royal Government of Cambodia. (2023). Pentagonal strategy—Phase I for growth, employment, equity, efficiency, and sustainability: Building the foundation towards realizing the Cambodia Vision 2050.
Skedsmo, G., & Huber, S. G. (2020). Unintended effects of accountability policies and the quality of assessment and evaluation formats. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32(4), 427–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09347-3
Sözen, E., & Güven, U. (2019). The effect of online assessments on students’ attitudes towards undergraduate-level geography courses. International Education Studies, 12(10), 1–8.
UNESCO. (2005). Guidelines for inclusion: Ensuring access to education for all.
UNESCO. (2015). Rethinking education: Towards a global common good?
UNESCO. (2024). Summary report of the first 2024 Global Meeting of the TTF School Leadership Network
WHO Working Group. (1989). The principles of quality assurance. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 1(2-3), 79-95. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/1.2-3.79
World Bank. (2023). Reforms improve education quality benefiting half a million students in Cambodia.
Yasmin, F., Akter, S., Touhiduzzaman, M., Razu, M. W. Z., & Hossain, M. A. (2026). Teacher activities and student participation in university classrooms: A cross-sectional study in the technological era. Scientific Reports, 16(1), 5325. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36080-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Veasna Kou, Vannak Sorn, Chansean Mam, Sovann Ly
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Content Licensing, Copyright, and Permissions
1. License
International Journal of Research in STEM Education has CC-BY NC or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work for non-commercial purposes. The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons License
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
The International Journal of Research in STEM Education's objective is to disseminate articles published as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, this journal permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and this journal on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
Copyright, and proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books, The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, The right to self-archive the article, the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (International Journal of Research in STEM Education).
The author has a non-exclusive publishing contract with a publisher, and the work is published with a more restrictive license, the author retains all the rights to publish the work elsewhere, including commercially, because she/he is not subject to the conditions of her / his own license, regardless of the type of CC license chosen.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement can be terminated by the author or International Journal of Research in STEM Education at two months' notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party's notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of the International Journal of Research in STEM Education.
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by This agreement can be terminated by the author or International Journal of Research in STEM Education upon two months's notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party's notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of the International Journal of Research in STEM Education or its sublicensee.
8. Miscellaneous
International Journal of Research in STEM Education‚ will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article's editorial process is successfully completed and the International Journal of Research in STEM Education or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. International Journal of Research in STEM Education may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible, and such access will be free of charge for the readers.
