A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE USE OF OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES (OER) AT E-LEARNING UNIVERSITY AND FACE-TO-FACE UNIVERSITY IN YOGYAKARTA (A CASE STUDY AT UT AND UNY)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33830/ptjj.v20i2.454.2019Keywords:
Open educational resources; perceptions, OER; questionnaire.Abstract
Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menemukan dan membandingkan tingkat penggunaan Open Educational Resources (OER). Penekanannya adalah pada yang mempengaruhi penggunaan OER dan persepsi tentang penggunaan OER dari dosen E-learning University dan Konvensional (Face To Face teaching) Universitas di kota Yogyakarta. Fokus studi murni melibatkan dua universitas negeri: Universitas Terbuka (UT) sebagai Universitas E-learning dan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta (UNY) sebagai Universitas Pembelajaran Tatap Muka. Data dikumpulkan dari sampel 30 responden dari masing-masing universitas menggunakan metode kuesioner. Hasil data menunjukkan bahwa dosen di kedua universitas memiliki keterampilan teknologi ahli, dan keduanya menggunakan sumber daya digital dan OER. Para dosen UT, bagaimanapun, menunjukkan persepsi yang lebih positif tentang penggunaan OER berbeda dengan kuliah sebagai bahan pendukung daripada UNY.
References
Atkins, D. E., Brown, J. S., & Hammond, A. L. (2007). A Review of the Open Educational Resources (OER) Movement: Achievements, Challenges, and New Opportunities. The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.
Bissell, A. N. (2009). Permission granted: Open licensing for educational resources. Open Learning, 24(1), 97-106.
Bliss, T. J., Hilton III, J., Wiley, D., & Thanos, K. (2013). The cost and quality of online open textbooks: Perceptions of community college faculty and students. First Monday, 18(1).
Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., Lack, K. A., & Nygren, T. I. (2014). Interactive Learning Online at Public Universities: Evidence from a Sixâ€Campus Randomized Trial. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(1), 94-111.
Geith, C., & Ignore, K. (2008). Access to Education with Online Learning and Open Educational Resources: Can They Close the Gap? Journal of asynchronous learning networks, 12(1), 105-126.
Hatakka & Mozelius (2009). Build it and they will come?–Inhibiting factors for reuse of open content in developing countries. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 37.
Harsasi, M. (2015). The Use of Open Educational Resources in Online Learning: A Study of Students' Perception. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, v16 n3 p74-87.
Hilton III, J., & Laman, C. (2012). One college’s use of an open psychology textbook. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 27(3), 265-272.
Larson, R. C., & Murray, M. E. (2008). Open Educational Resources for Blended Learning in High Schools: Overcoming Impediments in Developing Countries. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(1), 85-103.
Lovett, M., Meyer, O., & Thille, C. (2008). JIME-The open learning initiative: Measuring the effectiveness of the OLI statistics course in accelerating student learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2008(1).
MacDowell, E., A. (2010). Using Open Educational Resources to Help Students Understand The Sub-Prime Lending Crisis. Journal of Business Education, Vol. 3, No. 11.
Pagram, P., & Pagram, J. (2006). Issues in e-learning: A Thai case study. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 26.
Robinson, T. J., Fischer, L., Wiley, D., & Hilton III, J. (2014). The impact of open textbooks on secondary science learning outcomes. Educational Researcher, 43(7), 341-51. doi:10.3102/0013189X14550275.
UNESCO. (2002). UNESCO Promotes New Initiative for Free Educational Resources on the Internet.
Unicef. UNESCO (2007). A Human Rights-Based Approach to Education for All: A framework for the realization of children’s right to education and rights within education.
